No passwords, No popups, No cost because ...
as an eBay Partner & Amazon Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
Authoritative!
and curated with aloha by
ted_yosem
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
- Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  a public forum for
  Metal Finishing Q&As
  since 1989

-----

Best pretreatment for tin plating on aluminum?

Quickstart:
     It isn't possible to electroplate directly onto aluminum because it instantly oxidizes. So pretreatment usually includes an immersion in zincate which electrochemically replaces that aluminum oxide, leaving a zinc surface to electroplate onto. Alternatives include analogous proprietary processes like "Bondal" (zinc+nickel) and "Alstan" (all tin).


Q. What do you believe the best process to electroplate tin to an aluminum 6101 alloy to be? I am currently working with the Alstan process with cyanide but if I get funding for a new line I have been thinking about looking into double zincate before the tin.

Halee
- Mississippi
July 23, 2024

Ed. note: Since 1989 this forum has enjoyed the camaraderie & warm aloha that real names allow. If you are not into that spirit, the curator and some 'regulars' may be less likely to engage with you.

A. Hello Halee,

We don't suggest brands or sources in this forum ( huh? why?), but the idea behind the 'all-tin' process was presumably that if you don't need copper or nickel plating before the tin plating, it might be simpler to optimize the pretreatment process for tin plating rather than optimizing it for copper plating. I have seen it very successfully used in a bus bar plating factory where, because they only needed tin plating, why do copper plating first?

On the other hand, if you sometimes do copper plating on the aluminum, it might prove simpler to use a single pretreatment process for both copper and tin plating rather than using two different pretreatment sequences.

One final way to look at it is that if you are getting customer service for the proprietary sequence, it could prove invaluable in time of need; if you are not getting any, why deal with the complications introduced by a proprietary about which, by design, you will never get full info?

Luck & Regards,

ted_yosem
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"