No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Writer needs info for a piece on powder coating on hot dip galvanized fabrications




 

I'm a technical writer, doing an article for FABRICATOR Magazine, a NOMMA publication. I'm interested in talking with someone who has done powder coating on hot dip galvanized fabrications...the subject of a forthcoming piece. At the very least you'll get some free publicity from all the members of the Nat'l. Ornamental Misc. Metals Assn. Phone 262-790-2670, e-mail cera@execpc.com

John C [last name deleted for privacy by Editor]
(Freelance Writer) - Brookfield, Wisconsin

Ed. note: Sorry, this RFQ is old & outdated, so contact info is no longer available. However, if you feel that something technical should be said in reply, please post it; no public commercial suggestions please ( huh? why?)




I have done some powder coating on hot dipped galvanized parts. These parts were used for outdoor usage. The company that produced the raw dipped tubes actually had a proprietary type material that was applied to the surface as it was raised out of the process. This final proprietary topcoat was a clear material that was supposedly intended for increased protection of the bare product from the elements. My concern was that we ran the raw tubes through a 6 stage caustic washer and I was afraid this material would cause problems. I called the tube manufacturer and talked to two separate people, one person said they try and apply as much thickness of the material as they can and the other person told me they try to put the material on as paper thin as they can. The tube company would not tell me what the material was. MSDS only said proprietary. Testing showed that it was comparable to most pretreatment. I did have some problems with this material flaking a bit. It caused cosmetic defects on parts and the flaking was visible when closely viewed. I believe that when companies spent monies to purchase quality pretreatment systems, utilization of the pretreatment should be made to the actual surface of the substrate. Once these hidden proprietary coatings are applied, the pretreatment system is of second nature and the control process is taken away from the manufacturing facility. Just thought it might be interesting for some of the readers....

bob utech
Bob Utech
Benson, Minnesota
 




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"