No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Stainless Steel Plate Finishing Suggestion Wanted




2001

Hello..

We are a small manufacturing company in Santa Barbara building scientific instruments.. Currently, one of our mechanical components is a stage that we fit to an inverted optical microscope that is used for moving samples around.

The stage surface is approximately 12" x 12" and is machined out of 17-4 SS. We are currently finishing the plates with a lapping process and then a polishing process that are time and cost extensive..

The advantages of the process are a highly polished mirror finish and flatness.

The diadvantages are that the surface scratches easily and the process takes several labor hours.

We are looking to replace the lapping and polishing process with a coating of some sort...

Any suggestions?

Tony Pascone
- Santa Barbra, California



2001

You might be able to make the part out of a zinc die cast, then copper, nickel, chrome plate, but that won't give you as flat a surface like what you are getting by lapping.

You might be able to use cold rolled steel, then electroless nickel to maintain whatever flat surface you start with, then 3 millionths of an inch of chromium for hardness, but it would still scratch eventually.

tom & pooky   toms signature
Tom Pullizzi
Falls Township, Pennsylvania


I see two options:

(1) Are you using 17-4, or is it 17-4PH? If 17-4PH, are you precipitation-hardening after machining but before lapping? If not, you could pick up extra hardness and scratch-resistance by doing so. But this will increase the lapping time, so there's a downside to the extra hardness.

(2) Use a material that is softer than either 17-4 or 17-4PH thereby reducing your machining and lapping costs, then plate it as suggested by Tom Pullizzi. A stainless steel would seem to be appropriate to the application, but 17-4(PH) are at the harder end of the stainless steel range, not the softer end. This would also give much higher surface hardness than option (1). The softer substrate wouldn't seem to matter, as you're looking at light mechanical loads.

Bill Reynolds
Bill Reynolds [deceased]
consultant metallurgist - Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
We sadly relate the news that Bill passed away on Jan. 29, 2010.

2001




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"