No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

Cancave surface after electrolytic nickel plating on tiny surface





I am plating nickel on tiny aluminum surface by electroplating method. The diameter of the surface is only 300 microns. I found that no matter what I changed the process, I always got a concave surface. The center of the finished surface is about 20 to 50 microns lower than the edge. Can anybody explain why this happened, and how to solve this to get a flat finishing? I didn't get this type of problem using electroless nickel.

Thanks.

Joe Dimmer
- Cleveland, Ohio
2001



2001

I believe you are experiencing a microelectrode effect. The edge of the surface plates faster than the rest of the surface because the current concentrates more at the edge (that is why you don't see this phenomenon with electroless plating because no current is applied). If the edge area is large relative to the surface area the thickness "peaking" around the edge is much more noticeable. Your aluminum surface is very small so your edge area is quite significant. You could try shielding the edge with a thin wire to draw current away, or if the aluminum surface is part of a larger body of material you could try using photoresist to mask off everything but the aluminum (and make the edge less accessible to the metal ions). However, if you use photoresist it should be thicker than the plated nickel. You could also try increasing the distance from your part to the cathode. Are you plating some sort of electronic component?

lise bertsch
Lise Bertsch
Vishay Thin Film, Inc. - Niagara Falls, NY



2001

Joe

One of the ways to correct this problem is to use periodic reverse currents. 20 msce forward followed by 1 msec reverse with the reverse current being 3 times the forward current will get rid of the dishing.

Pat Mentone
Pat Mentone
St Paul, Minnesota




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"