No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

17-7 PH Stainless as a Contact Material?




2001

Hello,

I am working on a new part which is composed of a stamped spring made of 17-7 PH stainless in contact with a chromated aluminum tray. Though this does not have to be a high reliability electrical contact, I am relying on some degree on conductivity (ground return path).

The material is formed dead soft, then heat treated to a Yield of around 150 KSI. The heat treatment is supposed to be done in an inert gas environment.

After heat treatment, the surface of the metal changes from a normal bright stainless color to a dull grey (military looking) finish.

Does anyone know if the heat treatment significantly effects the conductivity of 17-7 stainless, especially on the surface where discoloration is apparent? If there is a surface effect, is there a process which could be used to restore surface conductivity?

Finally, has anyone out there seen 17-7 used in an application that requires electrical performance or any degree?

Thanks,

Tai Rosander
- Pullman, Washington, USA



The dull grey is usually an oxide layer. This will definitely lower the conductivity of the surface. Abrasive cleaning may remove this tenacious layer.

To keep a stainless clean, do not simply use a "nitrogen" atmosphere because the water vapor will react with the steel. I would suggest a reducing atmosphere with at least 75% hydrogen. This will keep the surface bright and reduce the thickness of the oxide layer to a minimum. Many heat treaters have this capability. If your local one does not check around on the net for the closest one that does.

Paul Bruessow
Eaton - Myakka City, Florida, USA
2001


Hydrogen is not that great of a reducer at the aust. or aging temp. a vacuum of 5x10-5 torr or less will produce a much cleaner part.

Mike Momo
- Florida
2005




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"