No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Concentration of Passivate Bath (Nitric for Stainless)




Our stainless steel passivate bath (30% nitric) has caused severe dulling of the part. I am not sure that our bath is made up at the correct concentration. Could someone give me some guidance as to what the nitric concentration should be and why this dulling occurred.

Karen Phillips
- Charlotte, North Carolina
2001


Different stainless alloys require different passivate "baths" to avoid damage or discoloration of the material.You can refer to the current spec. which is ASTM A967 -99 or the old standard, Mil-Spec QQ-P-35C (canceled) [link is to free spec at Defense Logistics Agency, dla.mil].

Good Luck.

Bill Grayson
- Santa Cruz, California, USA
2001



simultaneous replies

Run some samples on a 20% by volume of nitric acid with 2-3% of sodium dichromate. Ask your customer for process specifications on this particular part.

The parts may dulled due to contamination in the bath. A good rule of the thumb would be to test a small batch of parts prior to start-up.

Another reason the parts could dull can be load size.
Cut back on the load size.

Regards,

Joel Garcia
- McAllen, Texas
2001



Hello Karen!

To add onto Bill Grayson's answer: ASTM A967, AMS2700, and QQ-P-35 all list recipes for passivation solutions and recommendations for using which bath for which grade. Yet the olde, cancelled, federal specification QQ-P-35 is freely available on the Net. Go to assist.daps.mil to get to the ASSIST page, and use the Quicksearch button to get the search screen. Type in QQ-P-35, and you'll get the pdf file of the old spec. Table 1 has the recipes, table 2 has the recommended baths for various stainless grades.

We "solved" our longstanding problem of etching on 416 and 440C grades by switching away from a type II bath, to a type VIII bath for those grades.

I hope this helps!

lee gearhart
Lee Gearhart
metallurgist - E. Aurora, New York
2001



2001

Karen:

You probably have one of two situations:

1) The bath has become too dilute, making it a reducing acid bath(See ASTM A967 for correct concentration), or you need a dichromate additive for your grade of stainless.
2) You have a "poorer grade" of stainless which can do this sometimes in nitric acid.

You can resolve either of these situations by using a citric acid bath which meets ASTM A967. Some formulations are safe for all grades and gives excellent performance compared to nitric.

lee kremer
lee kremer sig
Lee Kremer
Stellar Solutions, Inc.
supporting advertiser
McHenry, Illinois
stellar solutions banner


none
www.finishing.com is made possible by supporting advertisers ...
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages



(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"