No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ

finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Passivation Testing

We do low quantity periodic passivation of 304 and 316 SS? In order to comply with QQ-P-35C (canceled) [link is to free spec at Defense Logistics Agency, dla.mil] we apparently have to invest in a humidity chamber or other relatively expensive equipment. I am trying to determine if I could do the copper sulphate ⇦ this on eBay or Amazon [affil links] test instead, but have gotten some information that it is too sensitive and not recommended unless specifically required. Can you tell me if this is true?

Peter Frazier
-Murray Hill, NJ
2001

The copper sulphate the ferroxyl tests are sensitive to free iron or oxide surface contamination. However, any decent passivation of 304 or 316 stainless steel should eliminate free iron and iron oxide. The copper sulphate test is tricky and subject to false interpretation on 400 series alloys.

Larry Hanke
Minneapolis, Minnesota
2001

(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories: