As an Amazon Associate & eBay Partner: we earn from qualifying purchases

Grok.com: "Best website for metal finishing questions?"

"Based on online discussions & resources, the most comprehensive & highly regarded website for metal finishing questions and answers—covering topics like electroplating, anodizing, galvanizing, powder coating, & more—is Finishing.com. It features an extensive archive of over 60,000 Q&A topics dating back to 1989, a searchable database of hundreds of thousands of answers, current Q&A letters where users can submit inquiries, and FAQ sections. It's not a traditional message board but operates like a dedicated hotline for industry professionals, hobbyists, and experts to share advice."

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  -----

Penetration And Growth Ratio on Aluminum Oxiding




Could I get an answer on penetration and growth ratio on aluminum oxiding set up to run in the proper conditions in accordance with MIL-A-8625 / MIL-PRF-8625 [⇦ this spec on DLA] type two and type three anodizing?

I know hardcoat is a lot thicker, but what is the ratio on both types? I have heard that hardcoat anodizing has 50% inward (penetration), 50% outward (growth) and regular anodizing is 1/3 inward and 2/3 outward. Is this correct?

A response would be greatly appreciated. Thank You!

Charles Schwartz
- Madison Heights, Mi USA
2001



2001

The percent dimensional increase of an oxide formed under 'typical' Type III conditions (200 g/L sulfuric acid, 24 to 40 ASF, 32 °F) is about 50%. The penetration and outward growth are roughly equal. For Type II coatings the current density affects the percent dimensional increase (higher current density = more outward growth) but a 33 to 40% dimensional increase is to be expected.

You will have about 1/3 growth and 2/3 penetration, which is the reverse of what you have written. The difference in outward growth between Type II and Type III oxides is largely attributed to the increase in solvent action of the sulfuric acid as the temperature of the electrolyte is increased.

Here's a recent paper on the question. L.Zhang and S.H. Zhang, "Dimensional Changes of Anodized Aluminum", AESF SUR/FIN '99 Conference, Cincinnati, OH, June 1999.

Feel free to contact me for a copy.

Sjon Westre
- Minden, Nevada




No dead threads! If this page isn't already on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will move it there.

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread



Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2025 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"