Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
The authoritative public forum
for Metal Finishing since 1989
-----
Cleaning chromate conversion coating
We use yellow chromate conversion coating, MIL-C-5541 extensively on our aluminum components. The components are assembled to printed circuit assemblies which are cleaned in an aqueous solution at 160 degrees F with a saponifier that has a pH of nearly 11. Would you expect the coating to be stripped from the parts during this process? We have been having trouble with this problem? Wondering if this could be attributed to the coating thickness? Are there ways to measure the coating thickness without damaging the components? Is there a similar coating that may withstand our cleaning process?
Dave Girling- Manchester, Iowa
2000
Such a high pH would lead me to believe that something in your cleaning solution is attacking the finish. Considering that chromate conversion coatings have no real "thickness" to them. I would venture to check the MSDS of your cleaner solution and see if it has a sodium hydroxide base in it. Or something similar.
As far as alternative finishes go there isn't any that I'm familiar with.
I think a couple of the guys around here do the Boeing based boric-sulfuric process as an alternative to chromates and chromic acid anodizing but I have not a thread of knowledge on this process. It might work, it might not, I can't tell you for sure.
Matthew Stiltner- Toledo, Ohio
2000
Aluminum should be cleaned in a neutral ph material at no more than 140 (maybe less) There is no question in my mind that the solution and temp is effecting the chromate.
Drew Nosti, CEF
Anodize USA
Ladson, South Carolina
2000
I have a presentation about chromate conversion coating. I hope to send to me some information about this report as soon as possible.
Thank you,
Al-Juhani- Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
2002
Investigate Alumiplate.
We have had luck with this alternate bath plating process replacing cadmium w/ chromate finish.
- Lombard, Illinois
2005
Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread