No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Etching Aluminum - MIL-C-5541 Class 1A

Q. A customer part calls out "MIL-C-5541, Class 1A - DO NOT ETCH". Chem Film Supplier is telling me that in order to be compliant with MIL-DTL-5541, a minimal mild etch must be applied, therefore the "No Etch" instruction must be changed to "minimal etch".

These parts were designed ages ago ... and used to be machined from castings. Today they are machined 6061.

We've asked the customer how they wish to proceed but wanted to ask here if indeed etching, even mild, is "required". The 'do not etch' instruction has been in-place for years and this is the first time we've been told about it from the supplier.

C Fisher
- Illinois
January 25, 2024


A. Hello C,
As a practical matter, the issue probably could become moot these days because the reason for not etching was probably to not bring about discoloration by etching a casting :-)

If your customer is made aware that the update of the substrate material might render the 'Do Not Etch' requirement unnecessary, hopefully everything can be simplified. Of course if this is an aerospace part, it might be a little more complicated than that.

As for exactly what the spec says, you and your customer will first need to decide if the ruling spec is an old version of MIL-C-5541 or the current version of MIL-DTL-5541 [on DLA], and then carefully read the applicable spec. The supplier may be acting 100% in good faith or might be slightly shading their interpretation because they've found that the process is more robust with a slight etch :-)

Luck & Regards,

ted_yosem
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey


A. I cannot find anything in 5541 which would prohibit etching. There is a note in the non-mandatory notes section which states that non-etching cleaners are preferred.

Chris Jurey, Past-President IHAA
Luke Engineering & Mfg. Co. Inc.
supporting advertiser
Wadsworth, Ohio
luke banner




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"