No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


 

adv.
ti anodizing  russamer labs banner



Jump to this related thread:

Topic 26092 "Galvanic corrosion when titanium and aluminum are in contact"

Topic 3649 "AMS2487 & AMS2488 Type II Anodizing of Titanium Q&A"

• or continue with -----

Galvanic Corrosion Test for Titanium Anodize AMS 2487

Q. We are an aerospace metal finisher who anodizes titanium per the AMS 2487 specification. That spec requires, among a lot of others, a periodic test for 'galvanic corrosion'. The method specified is to tightly fasten a titanium anodized 1" x 6" flat plate to a similarly sized, bare, 1100 alloy aluminum plate using nylon bolts through (2) holes in the opposite ends. You expose that assembly to salt spray ASTM B117 for one week and then 'check for evidence of galvanic corrosion'.

I can find no spec governing that test and nothing that might give a hint of what a pass or fail would look like. Obviously, the bare aluminum is going to corrode -- especially at the junction of the two plates, because unlike in a standard salt spray test where a single, almost vertically inclined panel is exposed to salt fog such that any salt moisture ultimately beads off of the surface of the panel), the fastened-panel salt solution would just 'sit' between the panels, causing way more corrosion than would be experienced on a single panel whose salt solution mostly beads and drops off.

We have very spotty success with multiple labs in passing the test, in my opinion because they don't accurately interpret 'evidence of galvanic corrosion'.

Any experience or guidance would be helpful. I really can't see how the AMS organization can specify a test with such loose pass/fail criteria as that!

Mike Palatas
- Gardena, California
February 14, 2022


A. Hi Mike. Just a guess, but maybe you're supposed to tape or mask the edges because the corrosion you are looking for is not between the two panels but on the outside of the panels?

I also agree with you that if a spec calls for some kind of testing it needs to say what constitutes passing or failing that test :-)

Luck & Regards,

ted_yosem
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"