data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609bf/609bf7ec06bf67551c64cf7db86c75e1b2429ebb" alt="ted_yosem"
Curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e2f/26e2f7d702dd7be41aa0820ea5caf290b7b90d67" alt="finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry"
The authoritative public forum
for Metal Finishing 1989-2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f77c/5f77ca5bdcdc1dd640bc1c826f3906846739a5b0" alt="mfhotline"
-----
Penetrant inspection per ASTM E-1417
Q. Penetrant inspection per ASTM E1417. Is method B or D better for critical aerospace machine parts?
Tom Crescenzo- Holbrook, New York
August 24, 2021
MY QUESTION IS:
Penetrant inspection per ASTM E1417 method B or D, which is better for critical aerospace machine parts?
- Holbrook, New York
October 6, 2021
A. Hi Tom,
I am not an expert, but I can tell you that all critical engine components at my previous employer were tested with Type I, method D, sensitivity level 3 or 4 due to customer requirements. Hope that helps.
- Hildesheim, Germany
December 14, 2021
Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread