Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ

finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

The authoritative public forum
for Metal Finishing since 1989
-----

Electroless copper vs. Wood's Nickel strike for stainless steel

Q. Hello! Does anyone have experience using electroless copper (sodium hypophosphite) to replace Wood's Nickel Strike in preparation to deposit electroless nickel on AISI 430F stainless steel or another stainless steel? Is this good for preparing holes in stainless steel tubes for the back plating of electroless nickel?

Pedro de Araujo
- Itu SP Brazil
May 14, 2021

A. Hi Pedro. I have no experience in that, but doubt that it will work. To put us on the same wavelength, my understanding of the need for a nickel strike is this: plating will not adhere properly to surface oxides but instead must build metal onto metal whereas stainless steel instantly oxidizes. A Wood's nickel strike simultaneously dissolves that oxide while electrodepositing nickel onto it.

Although I could certainly be in error, I don't see anything in an electroless copper plating solution which will remove/dissolve the oxide coating on stainless steel.

Luck & Regards,

Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
May 2021

(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories: