No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


 

-----

Need a non-conductive finish for bendable stainless steel mesh

60130-1a
60130-1b

Q. We sell industrial endoscopes that feature a full articulating "bending section". The device is basically a medical endoscope used for looking inside industrial machines as opposed to a human body. The distal 3" of the insertion tube (round, 7 mm in diameter) is covered in a stainless steel mesh. We have a customer who requires that this distal section be non-conductive. Our current solution is the apply a "bending rubber" material to the entire section, thereby making it essentially identical to a medical endoscope. It is definitely non-conductive with the bending rubber applied, but this also increases the diameter and greatly reduces the achievable bending radius of the tip. So my question is, is there a coating out there (I'm hoping some type of spray coating) that will: 1. Make the bending section non-conductive; 2. Be permanent and not flake off the stainless steel mesh as it is deflected and moved in every direction, potentially thousands of times over its lifespan. This coating, if it exists, would have to permanently adhere to the tiny strands of the mesh in order to never come off.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

Sean O'Connor
- Traverse City Michigan USA
March 12, 2016



A. Hi Sean.

I'd be skeptical of a coating both adhering to stainless steel and being reliably non-conductive. You might consider a teflon bellows style sleeve. These are comprised of a stack of very thin teflon discs with the appropriate size hole in them. The outside diameter of disc 1 & 2 are welded together, then the inside diameter of discs 2 & 3, then the outside diameter of 3 & 4, inside diameter of 5 & 6, etc.

At the ends, teflon tubes are welded onto them that can be stretched over the stainless ferrules of your endoscope for a friction fit or with some sort of clamp. It still might cause some issue with the size of the outer diameter, but you would not lose any flexibility at all, and it would be reliably insulating and easily replaced. Good luck.

Regards,

ted_yosem
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
March 2016


A. Perhaps you could use a non-conductive sleeve at the articulating end to replace the stainless steel?

Ed Peters
- Frederick, Maryland USA
April 11, 2016




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"