No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

Problems with chemical coloring in automatic line




August 13, 2013

Q. Dear Sir,
I use chemical coloring in automatic line to color into gold anodized aluminum parts (chemically polished). The process is carried out correctly, but the parts from the lower rack are darker than those from the top. The rack length = 1 meter, and the coloring time = 45 seconds. The lower part enters and leaves the bath in additional time of 5 +5 seconds. What can be the problem?
Is the coloring bath too strong, or too fast?

Karolina Potocka
electroplating - Bydgoszcz, Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Poland


A. Check the thickness from bottom of rack to top of rack. If the bottom is thicker, then it is adsorbing more dye, then experiment with shielding until you can get uniform thickness all over the rack.

robert probert
Robert H Probert
Robert H Probert Technical Services
supporting advertiser
Garner, North Carolina
probertbanner
August 14, 2013


A. 3 things come to mind:

1. Parts on the bottom of the rack are getting a thicker coating (are you using a lead-lined tank by chance?)

2. Parts on the bottom of the rack are overheating during anodizing, causing larger pores, resulting in more dye absorption.

3. Uneven dye tank temperature (bottom of the dye tank is hotter than the middle/top). Easily solved by agitation/filtration.

45 seconds is way too fast in my opinion, it does sound like your bath is too strong. If the bottom part of your rack is in the bath for an additional 11% of the total dye time, I would think this definitely could be an issue with such a short dye time.

Marc Green
Marc Green
anodizer - Boise, Idaho

A. Karolina

If I read your post correctly, the bottom of the rack is seeing up to 25% longer dye time which could easily account for the variation. A longer immersion time will help reduce the variation but you will likely need to adjust the dye bath parameters to achieve the desired color.

Willie Alexander
- Colorado Springs, Colorado


August 19, 2013

thumbs up signThank you all for your help. I'll follow your advice and try to fix the problem.

Kind regards

Karolina Potocka
- Bydgoszcz, Poland




September 9, 2013

Q. My customer produces door handles; he uses AlMg3 alloy which consists of:

[(Fe0,07)(Si0,05)(Cu0,005)(Zn0,003)(Ti0,14)(Mn0,006)(Mg2,98)(Ni0,006)(Sn0,000)(Pb0,002)((Be0,004)((Cr0,001)(Al96,7)]

The heat/melt is low-pressure.

Unfortunately, the parts cannot be electropolished (sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, 95 °C) and anodized.

After anodizing the parts are porous, coarse and do not shine.

The parts made of cold-drawn aluminium do not cause such problems.

Is it the matter of alloy composition? Is there any component missing?

I would really appreciate your help.

Karolina Potocka
electroplating - Bydgoszcz, Kujawsko-pomorskie, Poland




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"