No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

High current density Electrodeburring




Q. It has always been suggested that high current density (CD) Electropolishing (well up into the gassing region) is best for removing burrs especially if certain features need to be kept sharp. I have experimented with deburring in the plateaux CD region (5A/dm2) and extreme gassing (60 A/dm2). The gassing CD region maintains sharpness on the sharp features while removing burrs where required whereas in the plateaux CD region, takes much longer (x 10 times) and totally rounds the sharp features by the time the burrs are removed.

Since there are many theories describing electropolishing i.e. anodic layer levelling.
Which theory best describes the theory that high DC is best for deburring applications....

Alan Tobin
- Ireland
September 5, 2012


A. There are two fundamental reasons for a greater rate of material removal on burrs during gassing: a) increased gassing at burrs surface accelerates the electrolyte circulation around them, and increases the rate of diffusion of the dissolved material and b) the current efficiency of metal dissolution increases with increased current density, Therefore metal removal rate is much higher on the burrs (since current density is higher on the burrs area).

anna_berkovich
Anna Berkovich
Russamer Lab
supporting advertiser
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
russamer labs banner
September 20, 2012



September 24, 2012

Thanks for your detailed answer Anna,
Q. The burr removal at high current density is also accompanied by a reduction in surface roughness (20%-30%). One would imagine, with the large amount of gassing, that a viscous anodic layer would be difficult to form or even maintain and hence the effect on surface roughness would be minimal.

In comparison in the plateaux range current density the viscous anodic layer offers a smoothening effect on peaks and valleys.

Alan Tobin
- Ireland




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"