No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Nickel plating characterization for QA purposes




September 6, 2012

Q. Good evening everybody,

We are using nickel plated copper base plates and I have some difficulties to define what should be our inspection criteria control plan.
Our drawing is saying PLATING : ELECTROLYTIC NICKEL - 2 to 6 micron - HALF DULL FINISH.

I would like to define which tests I have to implement for the first article evaluation (first time receive) and the standard for incoming inspection.
I read in a corporate document:
First article evaluation:
- salt atmosphere test
- No marked discoloration is permitted after 24 hour exposure to air at 200 °C ±10 °C. For SCR header use 150 °C ±10 °C.
-Adherence and ductility must be adequate to permit crimping and/or compression without evidence of peeling or cracking. To be performed on 10 parts from sample.
- flow and wet to at least 80% of the solder surface

Standard inspection:
- no blister or exposed copper
- no peeling, blistering or marked discoloration after exposure to 415 °C ±10 °C in H2 during 10 minutes
- thicknesses (supplier coc)


I would like to know if those tests make sense. Particularly the test "no peeling, no blistering at 415 °C ±10 ° during 10 minutes under H2"! Why under H2?

Thanks for your help

matthieu_salland
Matthieu Salland
product designer - Bruges, France



A. The H2 is a reducing atmosphere. At 415 °C in air it would turn several different colors of blue and yellow and possibly black.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida
September 6, 2012



Thanks for this answer.

Q. Could someone tell me if defined tests for first article evaluation and then for standard incoming inspection are sufficient to ensure plating quality?

At the beginning I would like to define better the alloy composition in our drawings (like 6 to 10% phosphorous) but it is hard to control, and moreover platers are never giving their recipe! What are the usual practices? Do customers only specify for example : "3 to 8µm Electroless Nickel phosphorus (6% to 10%) + 1 to 3µm Electroless Nickel-Boron (< 1 % B)" or they also request the plating to be compliant to some tests (as I defined here above)?

Thanks again for your help

matthieu_salland
Matthieu Salland
product designer - Bruges, France
September 10, 2012



A. Electrolytic nickel is 99.8% pure sometimes with traces of O, H and S. There is no P in it.
G. Marrufo

Guillermo Marrufo
Monterrey, NL, Mexico
September 11, 2012



October 18, 2012

Q. Dear all,

To give you more details for a better answer:
We are a company that is using copper or AlSiC baseplate on which we request our supplier to do nickel plating.
Regarding thickness, it depends on parts but typically for copper baseplate it is between 2 and 6 µm Electrolytic. For AlSiC baseplates, we are specifying 3 to 8 µm Electroless Nickel phosphorus (6% to 10%) + 1 to 3 µm Electroless Nickel-Boron (< 1 % B)
We would like our supplier to prove to us that the plating is compliant and that solderability is sufficient.

Regarding plating characterization, I found standard ASTN B733-04 for electroless Ni-P coating and B689-97 for electroplated engineering nickel coatings.

I would like to know if those 2 standards are suitable?
I think they are not talking about solderability; so could you tell me to which standard I could refer ?

Thanks for your help!!

matthieu_salland
Matthieu Salland
product designer - Bruges, France




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"