No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

Electropolishing of case hardened 304





March 9, 2012

Q. Hi All,

I will be electropolishing case hardened 304 steel. The case hardening is through low temp carburisation.
I realise that EP of this material will diminish the surface hardness somewhat but I will be limiting the amount of surface material removal.

Am I correct in saying that the anodic process will remove more Fe and Ni than the other 304 elements?
Could this lead to an increase in surface roughness due to the high C surface content?

Should I be concerned with a buildup of C in the electrolyte similar to the way we get a buildup of Fe over time due to the higher %wt of C on the surface?

One further item is the use of an anodic etch (pickling type) process. Does anyone see any concerns with utilising this type of process on a carburised steel.

Alan Tobin
- Ireland


Use caution dissolving the surface of carburized and hardened steel. I think, but am not certain, that you will get preferential dissolution at grain boundaries, resulting in dull micro-roughened surface.

You'll probably also be left with a carbon smut on the surface, and suspended carbon in the bath.

To some extent, the problem will depend on how the carburizing was controlled. Some operators excessively carburize to assure good hardening.

jeffrey holmes
Jeffrey Holmes, CEF
Spartanburg, South Carolina
March 14, 2012



March 16, 2012

I know permanganate is a good dissolver / remover of surface carbon.
Will a light sulfuric rinse be effective.

Would you advise that Carbon content in the bath should be monitored as well as Fe.

I do believe that the surface finish could deteriorate due to the high percentage of C and Fe atoms in surface layers. Since Fe is more conductive element it will be pulled out easier thus the surface layer post EP could have a higher C % than before EP.

Alan Tobin
- Ireland



March 21, 2012

You'll have to see how serious the carbon smut is. If significant, it's unlikely either permanganate or sulfuric will have much effect. Carbon is insoluble in any common chemicals. You'll need some sort of mechanical removal, ultrasonic, hand brushing, pressure washing.

There won't be any carbon to monitor in the bath as it is insoluble. It will float as a black surface scum to be skimmed off.

jeffrey holmes
Jeffrey Holmes, CEF
Spartanburg, South Carolina



That is complicated. We simply used our Universal electrolyte -- carbonized steel is electropolished and deburred the same way as regular stainless steel.

anna_berkovich
Anna Berkovich
Russamer Lab
supporting advertiser
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
russamer labs banner
March 23, 2012




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"