No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Chrome plating - anode slurry




January 1, 2012

Q. Hello all.
I am interested in chrome plating and one of its fatal flaws is the line of site LOS dependence on the anode. I have an idea to overcome this and would like to hear your opinions:

STEP 1:
Take lead powder and peroxide it in 5% sulfuric acid, to create protective layer on each particle.

STEP 2
Load the chromic acid solution with powder prepared in step one.

STEP 3
Vigorously agitate solution while performing chroming operations.

The theory is that the electrical conductivity of the solution becomes significantly increased by adding millions of micro anodes throughout the solution. The extent to which agitation will be required will depend on the size of the lead peroxide powder. Smaller particles will take longer to settle, hence less agitation will be required. Please note that the size of particles I am referring to here is on the order of microns.

What do you all think?

Clearly analysis needs to be done to determine optimal particle density. I'd suspect that to yield significant benefits total volume of the particles would need to be about half of the total volume of the solution.

Igor Petrusky
- Stuart, Florida, USA



Adding micro or nano particles may increase the conductivity of the solution but they do not becomes anodes.
Unfortunately, the areas that face the anode will still plate heavier than the low CD areas.
Experimentation is the only way to find out.

I think that you would be better off spending your time on developing shields, robbers and aux anodes.

I am a great fan of conforming mesh anodes as they can be tweaked to get the chrome to go where you want it as well as it allows a significantly higher plate rate because of the smaller anode to cathode distance.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida
January 5, 2012




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"