No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

Life of galvanised steel in highly corrosive environment




May 31, 2011

Hi,
We have been asked to provide a whole life cycle cost comparison between galvanised mild steel and grade 316L (1.4404) stainless steel. The products are recessed manholes to take pavement blocks on footpaths. I'll have to do this for other streetscape products at a later date also.

The project is in the Middle East - daytime temperatures from May to September are 46C (115F) to 54C (129F) degrees, nighttime 35 °C (95F). For the rest of the year temperatures are more bearable 25C/77F day and 18C/65F night.
The construction site is right on the coast - it has actually been reclaimed from the sea. Lots of salt in the air
Humidity apparently reaches 85% in the mornings reducing to 50-60% in afternoons
I don't have a measure for the salt content in the air but apparently it is very high.
There are regular strong winds and sandstorms.

For Galvanised Steel, we could galvanise to 70 microns or to 140 microns, but most of our competition will just comply with the European Norm and aply 70 microns.

In these extreme conditions is stainless the only thing we should use, or would you believe that a 70 micron coating of galvanised would survive for 20/30/40/50 years?

I would appreciate your opinions on the issue of Stainless 316L vs Galvanised Steel in these conditions.

Shane Curtin
Fabrication Employee - Wexford, Ireland



The UK and Ireland Galvanizers association has published a book on sustainability in galvanized products, and that has data that you could use.
If you are able to get 70u on manhole covers you might do well. I think you might more likely get 100u.
The standard calls for average of 85u, not 70. (but you didn't state material thickness, might be 70 for thin steel)

geoff_crowley
Geoff Crowley
Crithwood Ltd.
Westfield, Scotland, UK
crithwood logo
First of two simultaneous responses -- June 3, 2011



Second of two simultaneous responses -- June 6, 2011

Dear Sir,

www.galvinfo.com:8080/zclp/

You will find a calculator for predicting zinc coating life at this website. I believe the calculator is developed by the IZA (International Zinc Association).

Regards,

CS Leong
- Selangor, Malaysia


none
adv.
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages



(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"