No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

Important DFT/Tape Adhesion Issue




May 25, 2011

We have a CED coating (E-coating) plant and currently we are facing a problem with one of our customers ....

They are insisting that when a paint specification says 18-32 microns of thickness on a component a reading of 15-16 microns is also not acceptable for low density areas.

The component is square frame which is connected in the middle by a horizontal cross bar.The cross bar is getting low thickness i.e about 15-16 microns against the requirement of 18 microns.

We are insisting that five readings should be taken over the entire component and an average should be taken and if the average reading is more than 18 microns then the component should not be treated as rejection.

Please comment on this.

Another issue is the customer is insisting on checking Adhesion using Tape Test on weld areas and embossments.

Please comment on this as well.

Also it would be really helpful if I could get some supporting documents which could help me and my customer to identify and solve the issues.

Janhavi Sindhu
Plating Shop Employee - Pune, Maharashtra, India



A chain is as strong as the weakest link. I did not pen that but that is absolutely true. If the DFT is lower than the minimum prescribed by the customer then the coating is indeed defective. The customer has given a very wide range for the DFT and there is no reason why is cannot be achieved. The average method is not a norm for DFT inspection.

Gurvin Singh
Mohali, Punjab, India
June 2, 2011



(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"