No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989



-----

High Phos Electroless Nickel on Stainless Steel 303 and AA6061


September 15, 2010

My company currently plates high P EN Ni on SUS303 pin and AA6061 housing separately, and then plunge those 2 parts together (tight fit). I am now working on a project that changes the process sequence that move the EN Plating to after plunging. I found that the adhesion on SUS303 pin is not passing tape test. Do experts provide suggestions for this issue? The process I am now using is

1. alkaline clean
2. Rinse x 2
3. micro-etch
4. Rinse x 2
5. desmut (HNO3+NH4NH2)
6. Rinse x 2
7. Zincate
8. Rinse x 3
9. Acid Rinse
10. rinse x 2
11. zincate
12. rinse
13. EN Ni

Thanks

Benny Hong
- PRC



simultaneous replies

Your process steps are for aluminum and are inadequate for any stainless steel since there was/is no activation step. In fact, the nitric acid step probably is acting as a passivation step.
There is a very remote possibility that a sulfamate nickel strike after the zincate, might improve the adhesion enough to get by. Normally, you would use a high acid Woods Nickel strike on stainless, but that would very probably wipe out the zincate on the aluminum and it would not take the EN.

There are dozens of possibilities, but they all have a low probability of success.

Personally, I would try to stay with the current process. Warming the outer part and freezing the inner might allow you to get the desired interference fit with less force which will do less damage to the plated finish, which I will guess is the reason you are trying to go to a single plate step after the mechanical work.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida
September 15, 2010



You'll need to continue to plate them separately, Benny. Your pretreatment cycle looks fine for the aluminum, but the SS needs an entirely different pre-plate cycle. For the SS, you would do alaklaline clean, rinse, HCl activation, Wood's nickel strike, rinse, EN plate.

Jon Barrows
Jon Barrows, MSF, EHSSC
GOAD Company
supporting advertiser
Independence, Missouri
goadbanner4
September 15, 2010



We have discovered that the adhesion force is increased when the stainless steel pin is annealed before assembly and EN plating. 70% testing samples of annealed parts pass tape test, that is much higher than non-annealed parts (pass rate = 30%)

Do you know why the heat treatment improves the adhesion force?

Benny Hong
- PRC
September 28, 2010



Dear Benny Hong

Type 303 grade stainless steel is a free machining version of 304 grade via addition of sulfur and phosphorus. Also referred to as "A1" in accordance with ISO 3506. The typical chemical composition of 303 grade stainless steel is as follows: C: 0.15% max; Mn: 2%; Si: 1%; P: 0.20%; S: 0.15% min.; Cr: 17-19%; Ni: 8-10%. Type 303 grade stainless steel has good resistance to oxidation when intermittently exposed to temperature up to 760ļģ°. It also has good oxidation resistance in continuous service up to 870ļģ°. However, heat-treatment is not recommended as 303 grade stainless steel is sensitive to carbide precipitation with continuous use at 425-860ļģ°. The formation of chromium carbide will reduce the chrome availability for passive film formation and decrease the corrosion resistance.

During electroless nickel plating of stainless steels, a nickel strike using Wood's nickel bath is commonly used to improve the adhesion of the electroless nickel coating. The presence of passive film on stainless steel could influence the adhesion of the electroless nickel coating. On heat-treated 303 grade stainless steel, the depletion of chromium following chromium carbide precipitation will reduce the chrome availability for passive film formation. This may be one of the reasons for achieving 70% pass on tape test for adhesion.

T.S.N. Sankara Narayanan
T.S.N. Sankara Narayanan
- Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
(ed.note: The good doctor offers a fascinating blog, "Advancement in Science" )
September 29, 2010




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"