data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609bf/609bf7ec06bf67551c64cf7db86c75e1b2429ebb" alt="ted_yosem"
Curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e2f/26e2f7d702dd7be41aa0820ea5caf290b7b90d67" alt="finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry"
The authoritative public forum
for Metal Finishing 1989-2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f77c/5f77ca5bdcdc1dd640bc1c826f3906846739a5b0" alt="mfhotline"
-----
Rz vs. R delta Q - Friends or Foes
I am researching a new ball stud for the automotive industry with a high surface finish requirement. I am having to report surface finish using a new measurement standard to me called R delta Q, that exactly is this measuring? How does it compare to similar smoothness scales?
I am using a new supplier who has a new polisher and is reporting to me how his process capability has improved over a old polishing robot my past supplier used. In reviewing the process capabilities the Cp and CpK on the R delta Q measurements improved by 30%. However, the Cp and Cpk on the Rz measurements degraded by almost as much. Is there an inverse relationship between the two measurement scales?
Quality Engineer student - Rockford, Illinois
September 14, 2010
Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread