Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
The authoritative public forum
for Metal Finishing since 1989
-----
301 SS Passivated incorrectly
A subcontractor passivated 301 stainless steel parts using AMSQQP35 [canceled] Type VIII instead of Type VI or VII. The parts showed rust in the bend radius, indicating ineffective cleaning and passivation, where I would expect it. 1. I've always have had an issue with the copper sulphate ⇦ this on eBay or Amazon [affil links] test, since typically, the copper sulphate solution is only applied to a small spot, likely a "flat" surface, and least likely to be an area with smeared iron. 2. Most importantly, I haven't a readily available published resource. Is there likely to be metallurgical attack of the 301 from Type VIII time-temperature-chemistry?
Douglas Hahnprocess engineer - Saint Charles, ILLINOIS
September 8, 2010
(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)
Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread
Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread