No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Alternative to Titanium Racks for Electropolishing




I am currently using titanium racks to electropolish stainless steel which is then vacuum brazed to other components when the product is assembled. The physical contact of the stainless steel to the titanium is depositing titanium oxide on the faying surfaces which inhibits proper wetting of the braze. Are there alternatives to titanium racks that will also resist the corrosion of the current as well as concentrated phosphoric and sulfuric acid?

Jonathan Finney
Mnf Engineer - Bath, New York
August 7, 2010



August 10, 2010

Hi, Jonathan. Have you tried good old copper? Not being a chemist, it surprises me that it can work, but I know of several electropolishing installations with copper racks.

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey



August 11, 2010

Copper racks would not last more than a day before it has been eroded to the point where parts would no longer be able to be fixtured. Additionally, dissolved copper would deplete the bath more rapidly as I see happening with small copper hooks connecting cathodes to the buss bar that are slightly immersed in the solution. I have heard that Aluminum is an alternative however this is also a "braze stopper." I have also heard of methods to remove the Titanium or Aluminum Oxides but all involve Hydrofluoric acid which is something I want to avoid.

Jonathan Finney
- Bath, New York



Hi, Jonathan. Please try polishing a small stainless item connected via a copper hook or wire in a beaker before being too insistent that it can't work :-)

I mentioned it only because I personally know at least two production shops that use copper racks for electropolishing of stainless steel. The fact that copper erodes on the cathode side doesn't necessarily mean it will erode on the anode side. Good luck.

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
August 11, 2010



August 11, 2010

Copper is the standard rack material because it needs to carry a high current. The copper will gradually erode, but it will be slow. Copper is also a lot cheaper than Titanium and a lot easier to machine. Tapping can be a small problem.

I never did it, but I think that you will not have any problems from having the rack plastisol coated, which will greatly extend its life.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida



August 12, 2010

Jonathan

Have you tried phosphor bronze for your rack tips? Alloy 510.

Willie Alexander
- Colorado Springs, Colorado




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"