Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
The authoritative public forum
for Metal Finishing since 1989
-----
High Build up Electroless Nickel Plating (without pits?)
I am currently trying to fix a problem with our EN process. We are depositing up to 0.012-0.018" per side but are ending up with pitting. I've been doing lab experiments adjusting parameters including air agitation, pH, wetting agents, temperature, loading ratios, preparation steps, and frequency of additions.
After examining the coupons, at about .003" the pitting has started. None of the pits were down to base metal. They all start from
.003-.005"
Is there something going on with the reaction when this much nickel is on the part?
Is there an adjustment that allows for higher build up?
Thanks!
Materials Engineer, Electroplating - San Diego, California, USA
May 26, 2010
While it could be caused by any number of things, the two most common is not enough or the improper anti-pit (wetting agent) and inadequate agitation (it takes great agitation). James Watts- Navarre, Florida Hello Mr. Rains, Monterrey, NL, Mexico What type of EN do you use, high P, mid or low? Sara Michaeli Tel-Aviv-Yafo, Israel |
What about filtration my friend...
It seems that orthophosphites is the culprit
Vikram Dogra
Irusha India - Chandigarh, India
July 16, 2010
I am not aware of any commercial EN that will plate that much. Few will go more than 0.003 and I have not heard of one that will routinely do more than 0.005. - Navarre, Florida My experience is in line with Guillermo's. If any chemistry or method could achieve 0.018" without pits, it would be news to me. I would like to hear what Don Baudrand would have to say about it. Jon Barrows, MSF, EHSSC GOAD Company Independence, Missouri |
July 21, 2010
I used to plate beryllium mirrors for lasers with greater than 0.010" of EN. They were subsequently diamond turned to final dimensions and flatness tolerances but they still need a minimum of 0.010" of pit free EN. Hydrogen micro-bubbles were the main culprit for me.
The secret was: lots of agitation, lots of filtration and ultrasonics.
Tim Hamlett, CEF
- West Palm Beach, Florida, USA
Hi Tim,
Scientific applications, specially optical, are in the top rank of surface finishes. Obviously, once finished, you are talking about the most perfect surfaces there can be, but, how thick did you actually plated and how was the surface finish of the mirrors as plated? What chemistry did you use and how many turn overs could you get?
G. Marrufo
Monterrey, NL, Mexico
July 25, 2010
Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread