No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

How to measure copper plating thickness on steel




WE ARE MANUFACTURERS OF WHITE METAL BEARINGS & COPPER PLATED GASKETS.

WE DID COPPER PLATING ON MILD STEEL, ABOUT 70 MICRONS ON EACH FACE.
FIRST FLASH COATED WITH A CYANIDE COPPER DEPOSIT,
COPPER PLATED.

QUESTION IS : WHAT IS THE ACCURATE METHOD OF COPPER PLATING THICKNESS MEASUREMENT & WHICH INSTRUMENT CAN GIVE ACCURATE READINGS.

MRUTYUNJAYA KATTEPPANAVAR
PLATING SHOP - KARNATAKA, India
May 21, 2010



First of three simultaneous responses --

That all depends on the accuracy that you need. A magnetic device may be all that you need. Beta back scatter would be better. Cutting a part for metallurgical examination is very accurate but destructive. If you need ridiculous accuracy, you are into very costly equipment such as SEM.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida
May 21, 2010



Second of three simultaneous responses --

Dear MRUTYUNJAYA KATTEPPANAVAR,
if you want the value with more accuracy, measure with X-ray.

Kannan Boopathi
- Salem, Tamil Nadu, India
May 24, 2010



Third of three simultaneous responses --

X-Ray Fluorescence can do it non-destructively with the proper thickness calibration.

Terry

Terry Tomt
- Auburn, Washington
May 24, 2010



May 25, 2010

Dear Mrutyunjaya Katteppanavar:

70u can accurately be measured by cross sectioning and calibrated microscope. However the cross sectioning is time-consuming and needs skilled people who know what they do.
I wonder if XRF can do the job, ask the suppliers for XRF layer thickness machines (UPA, Seiko, Matrix Metrologies, Helmut-Fischer, SII Nano technologies to name a few).
If this equipment cannot, a cheaper alternative is couloscopic measurement (again Helmut-Fischer, but more suppliers are available). Maybe start with the couloscope question and if this can't, think about the XRF. Both are quite big investments (the XRF app 3 times higher than a couloscope) the cross sectioning is cheap but as said needs skilled persons to give the accurate results it can give.
Before you buy any of these instruments, ask for a hire period and perform in that period an R&R study. You will not be the first one who's disappointed in the performance for your specific application. Or specify exactly what you really need and so expect. Bought is bought.

Best regards,

Harry van der Zanden
Harry van der Zanden
consultant - Tilburg, Netherlands




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"