No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Can't get required anodizing thickness on A380 casting




I have a small part (.01 Sq Ft) that's an A380 casting. Minimum thickness requirement is 30 microns and we're only achieving about half of that regularly now. We've tried varying time and Amperage (100 volt rectifier) on TI and AL fixtures but can't seem to get the thickness. Any thoughts on preferred Chemistry additives, temp, etc?

Chris Patterson
Plating Shop Employee - Williamsburg, Virginia
April 14, 2010



First of three simultaneous responses --

If you have 100 volts available, that leaves solution temperature, agitation, sulfuric make up and racks capable of carrying the amperage drawn. Also, everything but the contact points needs to be masked off for optimum use of available current.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida
April 16, 2010



Second of three simultaneous responses -- April 16, 2010

Are you aware that half the thickness is UNDER the original surface so if you are measuring mechanically then you have to double the reading.

If you are measuring with an eddy current instrument you must calibrate the instrument on a bare piece of the same cast alloy, and do it in several places to average out the porosity effect.

robert probert
Robert H Probert
Robert H Probert Technical Services
supporting advertiser
Garner, North Carolina
probertbanner



Third of three simultaneous responses --

Experience with A380 diecast tells me you can't get much over about 0.0007 - 0.0008" thickness. The more you try the more spongy and powdery the resulting coating will be. Excessively etching to remove alloying constituents will help your coating, but your customer may not be happy otherwise!

milt stevenson jr.
Milt Stevenson, Jr.
Syracuse, New York
April 17, 2010


Thank you all. We are masking all but contact areas on the racks, and have what we believe to be sufficient agitation and carrying capacity on the racks. We are running in the 40 deg F range, thoughts?. We are using a higher end eddy current device and calibrating on the actual parts. We understand the growth/penetration of the coating. What is your definition of significant etching?

Chris Patterson
- Williamsburg, Virginia
April 20, 2010




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"