No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

Plating Nickel Cadmium Diffused




November 17, 2009


Hello, please someone with experience in this process.

I am working with nickel cadmium diffused, with AMS2416; I have problems after the test of panel in Salt Spray ASTM ASTM B117 B-117 it is present small point to corrosion; I adjustment concentration of solutions, (degrease, activation, nickel, cadmium and conversion), density of current, time and rinse I can not eliminated to problem, This problem has diminished but I could have eliminated it.
Somebody can give me some advice of the possible causes the fails.

Note: The test panels are acceptable after test by thermal resistance.

Thanks.

MARIA L [last name deleted for privacy by Editor]
Engineer - Mexico



November 24, 2009

Hello Maria,
If your plating thickness is correct for both metals, two possible causes could be adhered gas bubbles and solid particles causing pores or pits on the surface. Remedy for the bubbles would be to use an approved anti-pitting agent. For the particles, to improve filtration. But the problem could also come from plating too thin and/or not uniform across the entire surface. Saludos regios,
Guillermo F. Marrufo- Monterrey, Mexico

Guillermo Marrufo
Monterrey, NL, Mexico



Hello Guillermo:

It verifies the thickness of nickel (0.002-0.0004 inch) and he is correct, the agent anti-pit this correct (verified), the bath has agitation by air and I have already in multiple occasions filtrated. We plating with nickel stainless steels and we do not have this problem, I think that is the form to activate the material, but I have until now not had good results, when inspecting the panels of test in stereoscope (100X approximately) I see small particles black however in the surface of the panel it does not have evidences of loosening in some zone of the panel, this phenomenon is not observed in the stainless steel panels because they is perfect.

MARIA L [returning]
Engineer - Mexico
December 1, 2009



December 9, 2009

Hi Maria,
At what point did you observe those black "particles" under the microscope, right after activation, after plating, after the diffusion treatment or after the salt spray test? Are they really particles or are they rather accumulated oxides?
G. Marrufo

Guillermo Marrufo
Monterrey, NL, Mexico



Hello Guillermo:

The particles coke, the coke not produced the pitting on the nickel. The real cause of the problem after analyze all the stages of the process was the raw material. is very important verify the raw material,superficial condition, magnetisms, roughness and heat treating. At the moment the test panels is perfect.
thank you!

MARIA L [returning]
- MEXICO
April 30, 2010




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"