No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

Foreign particles on Chrome Plated parts




I have been facing this problem for quite a long time , whenever we take the job out of the hard chrome plating vat and do the final buffing , there are small holes that are created due to the foreign particles (Foreign ferrous particles), in a job of 3 mtr these particles are at 2-4 places , but job is rejected due to these particles, what should I do to take these ferrous particles out of plating vat.

Vicky Nagpal
Plating Shop Incharge - New Delhi, India
September 21, 2009



September 21, 2009

Hi, Vicky. It is possible to continuously filter a chrome plating solution, and it has been done for critical operations. But due to the aggressively corrosive and oxidizing nature of concentrated chromic acid, it is not cheap or easy. If at all possible, it is better to keep the ferrous particles out of the tank. I suspect that the parts are not fully cleaned, or are not demagnetized before going into the chrome plating tank.

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey



September 21, 2009

It could be burs from the machining/grinding operation that are raised by the pretreatment steps.

Enter and exit the tank slower. You are probably stirring up the sludge on the bottom of the tank. On a Friday evening, hoe all of the trash off of the bottom of the tank and do that on a schedule.
Depending on your solution, you can get about 1 week out of polypropylene wound filters with the chrome at 140F. Some proprietary chrome solutions will not last that long. If you filter, I would try for a greater thru put of solution so would try a 25 micron filter first. I would not go below 10 micron.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"