No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Corrosion on 316SS Castings after Passivation




We are currently having a problem with cast 316 stainless steel and corrosion. After a normal passivation in a Nitric Acid bath, the surface of the casting is corroding (surface rust). There seems to be free Fe at the surface that is NOT being removed with passivation. Can someone please give a suggestion to eliminate this issue? We have done analysis on the material and it has come back with in the acceptable range for 316SS. We are in the process of trying electropolishing but are not sure what the effect will be.

Stefan Koveal
- Concordville, Pennsylvania
2000



2000

You would be amazed at the amount of iron that can be smeared and imbedded into the surface of SS. Using high speed steel inserts will do it, clamping will do it, movement across the table of a band saw will do it.

Passivation only attacks the extreme top surface of the smear (Fe). Repeated cycles will help some. Lengthened time in the passivation will do very very little. The best apparent answer is electropolish. This works extremely well, but is a higher cost process. Several vendors have links from this site. Check the vendor listings.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida



Nitric acid passivation is good the day the nitric is new and its all downhill from there. The desire to not buy new nitric and the disposal costs work in tandem to keep the solution in the tank far past its prime. At some point it quits passivating and becomes an iron immersion coating.

Our new Selective Abstraction Passivation gives the optimum passivation possible at all times. I think we all agree that electropolishing is the best form of passivation, but the cost and the appearance is not always required. SAP will provide the best passivation short of EP and does not change the surface finish.

Dan Weaver
- Toccoa, Georgia
2000



Another potential problem with stainless steel castings is porosity or nonmetallic inclusions. When microscopic porosity or large inclusions are present at the as-cast or machined surfaces, passivation solutions may not be fully removed by post-passivation rinsing. Subsequent corrosion by the retained acid will bloom 'rust' to the surface. Better control of surface condition of the castings or more aggressive rinsing after passivation will be required to prevent the rusting.

larry hanke
Larry Hanke
Minneapolis, Minnesota
2000



Stefan,

4 years ago a metallurgist associate of mine and I figured out how to cast 304 into ferritic sand. (Yes I know you aren't supposed to do these things). We were able to assist a v.large multi-national solve a huge problem. Few people would believe what we did until they saw the results with their own eyes. The results are in daily use on the rail tracks of a major American city! Cheers

Hamish Hunt
- Melborne, Australia
2000




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"