No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ

finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Tin Plated Stainless Steel Undercoats

We have customers that are requiring electro-tin plated stainless steel cases for their electronic components. They are plating in this sequence; Electro-tin (Mil-T-10727, Type I, .0003 min thk) over nickel (QQ-N-290, Cl 2) over copper (Mil-C-14550, Cl 3). Copper being on the base metal. It was our understanding copper does not adhere well to stainless and that the nickel should be deposited first on the stainless. Is this a correct assumption?

Norm Richarte
Product Designer - Hawthorne, California, USA
April 8, 2009

Your understanding is generally correct. For plating most metals over most stainless steels a Woods nickel strike is used. A Woods strike is an all chloride bath which is very aggressive and therefore adheres to the stainless. A strike is a thin plating.

The use of the copper without the strike is sometimes done if the stainless is a high copper alloy although adhesion (especially under duress) is marginal.

Gene Packman
process supplier - Great Neck, New York
April 15, 2009

(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories: