No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Electroplating plus xerography process; using laser beam to control selective plating



Q. Hello,

I have a theory that I am going to test in a simple experiment. I wish to combine electroplating with the xerography process. My theory is that you can destroy electrical charge on a surface when you expose it to high intensity focused light. I wish to control where the electroplating process actually plates the cathode by using a focused high intensity image. The first phase will consist of a laser beam that focuses on a specific area of the cathode. I am hoping that the area exposed to the beam will not be plated. I have a home made power source that is capable of 4000 watts continually at 120 volts DC. The current can be monitored and controlled digitally by my laptop. Any suggestions on design or settings or even if it will work? Also, I will be using mostly copper and iron. Any suggestions on the easiest electrolyte solution to put together?

Scott Ketter
hobbyist - Nekoosa, Wisconsin, USA
March 25, 2009




A. Hi Scott. It is difficult to electrodeposit iron for a couple of reasons related to its multiple oxidation states. It's not impossible, but most other metals, including copper, will be easier to electrodeposit.

I'd be very surprised if this idea of years works. And that is said not to discourage you, but to strongly encourage you to carry on! Good luck.

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey



March 31, 2009

Q. Test results

The following is a summary of the test results from my most recent experiment in combining the xerography and electroplating processes.

Plating Recipe:
5 oz Distilled Water
5 oz Distilled White vinegar in bulk on eBay or Amazon [affil links] (5% acidity)
1/4 Teaspoon Pure Salt
Ambient Temp = 72F
Ambient Light = 0 (Total Darkness)
Elapsed Time = 20 hours (approximately.)
Anode Material = Copper
Anode Connection = +746 VDC with the negative connected to ground.
Cathode Material = Ferrous Steel
Cathode Connection = Disconnected
Anode / Cathode Voltage Differential = 0.545 VDC

Setup:
I used a small jar with two stainless steel screws that suspended the anode and cathode materials in the solution. There was a small 5 mW laser that was focused on to the cathode. The anode was below the cathode in the solution approximately one inch. The cathode was a square inch steel plate with the laser target side facing up and the side closest to the cathode was facing down.

Results:
The bottom (anode) side of the cathode was plated very well with near perfect coverage and fantastic visual appearance. The top (laser) side of the cathode was not coated very well. The small area where the laser was focused did not have any coating at all. There was a discolored and slightly plated area around the focus point of the laser. The area near the edges of the top side was coated by copper but the coating wiped off very easily. I am not sure of the exact reason why the laser area was not coated. For now I can only speculate that the laser affected the ion flow over the top of the cathode and did not actually change the charge characteristics of the cathode its self. The gradient of coverage around the focus area could be due to the optical diffusion characteristics of the cathode material.

Future Experiments and Theories:
I believe that a high saturation of electrons in the plating bath will be more conducive to manipulation with focused light. My next experiment will consist of a thin sheet of aluminum foil that is suspended in the plating bath. I will use a higher voltage supply on the anode around 10,000 volts.

Scott Ketter
- Nekoosa, Wisconsin, USA




A. Hi Scott. I think what is missing here is a "control". From the geometry of your setup, I might have expected pretty much the result you got, i.e., you aren't yet demonstrating that it is the laser beam rather than your geometry which is favoring plating of the bottom of the cathode rather than the top side.

There is another issue with your setup, too. Copper will immersion deposit on steel without any electricity applied, so I think you should try a nickel or silver cathode (or a different plating solution). Continued success with your effort!

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"