No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

Walt's Nickel Strike?




September 10, 2008

Good Day,

I work for a small supply firm and here is what I got from a customer the other day: "I've got some 630-174PH or ASTM A564 and I need a Zinc/Nickel 12% with Condition H1100. Should I use Cold Plating or a Walts Nickel Strike?" I told him I would look into it which is my first mistake...the two local platers I use just stared at me with the same confused look I gave my customer.

I'm almost wondering if this customer was having some fun with me...is this an actual request a plater would get? I understand the ASTM A564 -G630 but everything else is Greek to me.

Adam Lawson
Supply firm employee (middleman for platers) - Vancouver, Canada



First of three simultaneous responses --

What you have been asked for is a 12% nickel balance zinc alloy plate. For 17-4PH material, I would use a nickel strike under it, but would use a WOOD'S nickel strike, not a WATTS' strike. The reason is for better adhesion of the alloy plate. The strike is not a requirement for some steel, but it is for stainless steels and I include 17-4 in that category.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida
September 12, 2008



Second of three simultaneous responses --

I doubt if he's having fun with you.

Although you'd have to wonder why he'd ask for a plating that has less general corrosion resistance than the 17-4PH stainless steel itself.

As to which process to use for the first layer, I'll shut up and leave that part of your enquiry to the platers.

Bill Reynolds
Bill Reynolds [deceased]
consultant metallurgist - Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
We sadly relate the news that Bill passed away on Jan. 29, 2010.

September 12, 2008



Third of three simultaneous responses --

are you sure it wasnt 'watts nickel'? or woods nickel ?
I've never heard of walts !

Jay Smith
- Essex, UK
September 14, 2008


The 630-174PH is a stainless steel alloy, usually used as a tool steel I think. The H1100 refers to the specific heat treatment for the alloy. The Walts Nickel Strike should probably be a Watts Nickel Strike, a very common nickel bath. A zinc/nickel alloy can certainly be plated, and a watts strike would be advised prior to the alloy. I did not check the specific ASTM specs that were noted but you can look those up.

Kurt Sammons
- Inman, South Carolina
September 15, 2008




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"