No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Passivating a brazed 440C assembly




July 10, 2008

I am a mfg engineer at my company who manufactures a selection of valves & actuators for the aircraft industry. On one item, we use an assembly consisting of (2) 440C components that are copper brazed together (Mil-B-7883).

The components are machined, passivated, brazed, heat treated with a case nitride to HRC 58 to 65, and then simply cleaned and degreased...in that order. I was called to investigate why the assemblies in stock are "rusting". There is no doubt in my mind as to why.

I want to move the passivation to the final step in the manufacturing of these items, but I am unsure what will happen to the braze filler material when exposed to the passivation solution. Will the assembly be unharmed by the presence of copper filler in the passivate solution? Any insight you can provide will be really appreciated.

David Vranson
Finish Specifier - Valencia, California, USA



The nitric based passivation solution will aggressively attack the braze. Worse than that, I think that after a few runs you will get a copper immersion plate on some parts of the valves.
Very faint but there.
Talk to the folks at this site that sell citric based solutions. It might be less aggressive.
440 is not rust proof, even when passivated. It is rust resistant. I assume that you are using a flux for the braze. I think that the flux will degrade the passivation.
My guess is that you will go to using a light oil and package each valve in an appropriate plastic container( baggie) Note that some of these will also cause rust.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida
July 11, 2008



David

ASTM A967 advises against passivating nitrided parts. See appendix X1.8

Willie Alexander
- Colorado Springs, Colorado
July 15, 2008



July 15, 2008

Good afternoon:

Just wanted to add a comment to what Mr. Watts has posted. Nitriding stainless steels further reduces their corrosion resistance. The nitrides formed at the surface will be chromium rich. For more details, you may want to consult the ASM Heat Treaters Guide for irons and steels.

Steve Bizub
- St Louis, Missouri



Nitriding issues aside, I can back up what James Watts said. citric acid does attack copper, but only slowly over a long-term exposure. For the amount of time of a passivation process, a copper braze would not be harmed.

ray kremer
Ray Kremer
Stellar Solutions, Inc.
supporting advertiser
McHenry, Illinois
stellar solutions banner
July 22, 2008


none
www.finishing.com is made possible by supporting advertisers ...
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages



(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"