No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ

finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Is secondary containment required for Powder coating wash system tanks?

adv.

Do I need a barrier around the powder coating wash system tanks in case of a rupture? Are there EPA or other regulations that must be followed and if so, what are they?

Dennis Rhodes
Powder coat shop - Canton, Ohio, USA
July 8, 2008

Hi, Dennis. Last time I checked, EPA had secondary containment requirements for cyanide but not phosphatizing solutions. But often there are secondary containment requirements enforced by local POTWs and occasionally regional authorities.

I like to use the terms "leak" or "overflow" rather than "rupture" because open-top metal finishing tanks don't burst open (at least I've never heard of a single case in a long career in metal finishing), whereas being cognizant of small leaks and the possibility of overflows is very important. Good luck.

Regards,

Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
July , 2008

(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories: