No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Can Zinc-Nickel plating be applied to INSIDE of already ASSEMBLED pipe spool for seawater conduction?




PROBLEM: Firewater piping on Offshore Platforms needs to conduct SEAWATER. This seawater is from tropical waters where Oxygen content and normal salts make it highly corrosive, both inside the wet (and stagnant) 10" header section up to the deluge valve, and also in the usually dry smaller pipe circuits to the spray nozzles and hydrants, where alternating wet-dry cycles cause even harder attack conditions. To try to solve this corrosive damage, where the complete piping has to be replaced every 3 to 4 years (even using heavy pipe schedule and thickness), some people suggest using Zinc galvanizing (electrodeposition type) to plate the inside of the pipe.

Please mention the possible advantages, disadvantages or plain difficulties of pretending to get adequate corrosion protection to the INSIDE of piping spools that are already assembled, for seawater inmersion. The idea some engineers suggested, is to try to get the plating to reach 25 to 30 micrometers with Zn-Ni or using Zn-Ni-Co MIL-P-85748 Spec, to be able to get 2000 hours of salt spray chamber test per ASTM B117.

(I believe that a pipe Spool, say 18 by 6 by 5 ft with a couple of 90 degree elbows and/or other pipe fittings is NOT going to be easy, not very expensive or even feasible); that the Zinc-Nickel or Zn-Ni-Co plating could even withstand the tropical seawater attack. But we need to analyze the real difficulties involved. your technical opinion will be highly appreciated. Then, a second question is: What is a better way to protect the seawater piping, since other alternatives like fiberglass reinforced pipe suffers from other shortcomings. TIA.

Alfred Claussen
Project Manager, engineering - Mexico City, MEXICO
June 27, 2008



July 1, 2008

Plating on the inside of a pipe requires an internal anode which is not practical in your case.
One possibility would be to High phosphorous Electroless nickel plate it by pumping the solution thru the pipe. Because it would take about 3 hours and EN is temperature critical, the entire coil would need to be in a water bath or a heated room to about 190F.

If it were me, I would look into teflon lined pipe. It is not cheap, but it is durable and can be assembled with normal shaped pipe fittings. It is an off of the shelf product with virtually no special assembly tools or techniques needed.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida


none
adv.
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages



(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"