Root cause for Hard Chromium plating defects

"Hard Chromium plating"
by Robert K. Guffie

on AbeBooks
(rarely)

or eBay
(rarely)

or Amazon

(affil links)

A. Hi John. I know that Guffie's book is hard to find anywhere, let alone Aden, but if somehow you can get a library loan of it or borrow it from another shop I think it would help you a lot. It's 18-page troubleshooting guide is perfect. But one of the first things it mentions is the importance of a Hull Cell for testing. Are you doing Hull Cell testing? If so, please comment on the results you get from it. Do you have good evidence that as this shaft rotates there is no current interruption? Thanks.

So far you have not told us what type of solution you are using, the current density, the temperature, the analysis, or anything, so there is little to go by yet. As we told Nadeem, "... if you would please describe ... the operational parameters you are employing, we will do our best ...". Thanks.

Luck & Regards,

You are doing two mistakes:
1- Working at low temperature
2- Using only SO4 catalyst.
Follow under shown steps you should get perfect result
# 1 Work at above 50 °C temperature.
# 2 Do not use only sulfuric acid catalyst, use non-etching Atotech HEEF 25 catalyst like Sulfonic acid/Fluoride catalyst.

A. Hi Shrikant. I'd be surprised if proprietary chrome catalysts are available in Yemen, but maybe they are.

Luck & Regards,

A. Dear Mr.Bai,

There are several possibilities to solve this problem, but to be able to help you I would like to know a few things.

1. What current density was used?
2. What was the pretreatment of the substrate?
3. Do you use a wetting agent in your bath?

If the problem was caused by poor grinding, there is a trick that goes like this:

Take the part out of the bath after 5 minutes plating time, rinse it and polish the part with waterproof sandpaper 240, until you feel that the part is very smooth.

Rinse again and put the part back in the bath. Wait 5 minutes to be sure the part has the same temperature as the catalyst and than start plating again by slowly increasing the current.(start at 0 V.) Good luck,

"Chrome Plating Simplified"
by Clarence H. Peger
(You're unlikely to find this for sale ... but copies are in select libraries)

from AbeBooks
* rarely available *

or eBay
* rarely available *
or

Amazon
* rarely available *

(affil links)

A. A person can not really tell without seeing the part, but it sure sounds like gas bubbles .

• Is the part really clean?
• Have you tried using pumice ⇦ this on eBay or Amazon [affil links] on a part as a cleanliness check?Have you over etched the part before plating?
• Did you activate the part before plating?
• Are you using a high enough voltage for the anode cathode distance so that it generates massive amounts of gas bubbles which tend to be self scrubbing?
• Have you racked the part vertically?
• Are your leads and contacts adequate for the total load?

As you can see, there is no obvious answer, buts lots of possibilities to check.

A. Robert Guffie's Hard Chromium Plating suggests poor basis metal, improper cleaning, incorrect catalyst concentration, or incorrect fume suppressant. The Canning Handbook [on eBay, Amazon, AbeBooks affil links] suggests particles of grease or stop-off wax or entrapped gas bubbles. Good luck with the troubleshooting!

A. Small pitting may be because of high reverse (etching) current or duration is high. Please review etching process.

A. This can be solved easily by giving agitation to cathode (means Rod to be plated),; another solution is give agitation to plating solution during plating time. Take a trial. Let us know what catalyst are you using & temperature?

A. Hi, MZ! If you cannot retain a consultant to guide you, see if you can get a supplier of the plating process chemistry to visit you and go over your situation. If that is not possible either, try to at least get hold of the previously mentioned books. Many people, like Robert Guffie, spent their entire careers trying to answer that question of yours, and it simply isn't possible to even lightly touch on all of the things that you must do correctly for good quality chrome plating in the paragraph or two appropriate for a public forum. :-)

But if you would please describe in detail a specific defect that you are encountering, and the operational parameters you are employing, we will do our best.

Good luck.

DEAR NADEEM,

FOR INTERNAL PLATING MOST IMPORTANT TO MAINTAIN ANODE CENTRE DISTANCE FOR UNIFORM PLATING AS WELL AS TO AVOID DEFECT IN THE CHROME PLATING. SECOND THING IS TO MAINTAIN TAPER IN ANODE FOR UNIFORM CURRENT DENSITY DISTRIBUTION.

DEAR RAJESH,
PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT TYPE OF DEFECT IN PLATING. WE THINK THAT MS PLATING IS MOST EASY PROCESS IF TAKE PROPER PRECAUTION. IF ANY PROBLEM PLEASE VERIFY BATH CONSTANT, CURRENT CARRYING FIXTURE. MOST PROBABLY IRON CONTENT OF YOUR TANK IS HIGH; PLS CHECK

A. Yes, Rajesh, it surely can. However, it is only one of a dozen factors that affect the plating, and I personally think that the odds of it being the principal problem are low. Please try to explain your situation because people here would like to help you but cannot do so until you tell us what is going on. Thanks.

Regards,

A. Guess one is there is trash in the chrome solution.
Guess two is that they are using air agitation in the chrome tank.
Guess 3 is that the plater is not correctly activating the roll before plating it.
Guess 4 is that the roll is cold when it is going into the chrome tank and expanding as it warms up.

A. Hi Dhanjay.

I do not believe it is practical to avoid the etching process in hard chrome plating because this will result in insufficient adhesion. However, you could try it, and then test the adhesion with the modified Ollard apparatus (see letter 18002).

Keep your eyes open for affordable copies of Guffie's book as it is out of print and hard to find, but it is what you asking for .

Regards,

Hi Asvin. One thing I would say is that parts that are damaged or dented before they get to the plating step obviously should not be plated. So if you are seeing damaged parts being plated you need pre-plating inspection closer to the plating step. Obviously, individual handling and excellent packaging will prevent damage after plating.

But please give us some info about your own situation. To simply brainstorm about the many ways that the piston rods of the world, ranging from model airplane pistons, to those of mighty ships could be damaged or dented before or after plating, and to suggest tactics to avoid it doesn't sound practical. Let's start with your piston rods and how they get damaged in your case rather than listing every possible way hypothetical pistons could get damaged. Please get back to us on that.

Good luck.

Regards,

A. First things first, let me qualify what I'm about to type here before I get started. I am not a metal caster, nor am I a chrome plater. I'm an anodizer with almost 30 years of experience. With that being said, from the pictures it does look like a substrate issue.

The reason I'm replying in this unfamiliar section is something that you typed in your question:

"We have not changed the process"

If I were a part of a set of triplets, all 3 of us together would not have enough fingers and toes to count up the amount of times I've heard this phrase. Hell, I've even used it myself.

Sure, it very may well be that you have not changed the process, but what you need to be asking/saying to your self, has something IN my process changed? And you answer that question by starting at step one, and verifying all of the parameters that you process by, are indeed meeting your internal specifications, all the way through the last step. During this step by step trouble shooting process you may find that yes, you are operating within parameters, but for some reason, perhaps one of your steps is operating at the higher, or lower limit of your process parameters..and you will learn a lesson that your specs need to be tightened up.

Unfortunately there is a lot of this (finger pointing) that will go on between coaters, and manufacturers. And you will hear the phrase I quoted quite often. It's a shame, as both of you have the same end goal....a quality product. If both sides sit down and take a hard, detailed look at their process, a reason for the process shift/defect can normally be found.

Diatribe complete, thank you for your time. Now, perhaps someone in this forum with experience in casting and/or chrome plating may be able to point you toward a cause of the defect you are seeing. :)

Q. I say we have not changed the process because the first question asked otherwise is:"If this hasn't happened in any of the previous lots then what changed in the processing of this lot?" I have access to a large amount of data throughout the processing of the part on my end, I have spent hours sifting through the information I have, observing microstructure, and digging into anything we believe may have resulted in this defect. Nothing stands out. That said, I have taken the time to go to my supplier and sit down with them. The end goal for both of us is getting quality parts out of the door, but we need to figure out the root cause of this defect. Has anyone seen anything similar to this?

Thanks in advance.

A. I'm not sure if 3 hour acid vibe is a typo or not. I've never heard that term.

However, looking at the pictures, it almost looks like you have inter granular attack occurring on the surface. Chrome plating is a negative leveler so the more chrome that is plated onto the surface, the more pronounced your defect will be.

If a 3 hour acid vibe is actually a 3 hour acid soak, the acid may be too strong or not inhibited and is causing an attack on the surface material.

"Trouble in Your Tank: Handbook for Solving plating Problems"
by Larry Durney

on Amazon

(currently UTL
on AbeBooks & eBay)

(affil links)

A. Hi Vishal. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy says "Don't Panic" -- it's a pretty universal rule, also the first one in Larry Durney's "Trouble in Your Tank, Handbook for Solving Plating Problems": never flail around changing things because you'll not only make it worse, but you'll quickly lose all the good stuff that experience taught you :-)

When there are a whole host of problems, experience counts and I would strongly urge you to locate a chrome plating consultant in your area. Often just a few minutes of his/her walking the line to spot what is obviously wrong, and doing a couple of quick titrations, can quickly solve the problem. But if you want to try to fight your way through these issues, it's possible that all of the problems you mentioned could be due to a simple solution imbalance ... so please tell us what you can about the solution analysis. Thanks!

Regards,

? Hi Mahbubur. Your descriptions of the problems you are encountering are very brief and subject to misunderstanding. Each of those three problems probably deserves a paragraph of detail :-)

Have you been successfully chroming for a long time now and suddenly these things went wrong ... or have you never successfully plated the molds ... or is it somewhere in between? When you say the chrome is only lasting a short time, what are you comparing it to? Thanks!

Regards,

A. Hi Vishal. Obviously 245:1.4 is not even close to the required 100:1 ratio, so I assume you are running a fluoride catalyst bath like SRHS rather than a conventional Sergeant bath?

Your current is 10500 Amps, but that's not your current density; your current density is 296 Amps/sq ft in English units if fully submerged.

I don't know the magnification of your photos, but I can't see anything in the 2nd photo, and in the first I see only a very vague splotchiness. Whether it's a staining or is actually pitted areas, the photo doesn't tell me. I'd suggest looking with a 10X loupe. If you send more photos, please include some common object like a coin, stamp, or tape measure in them to help us judge the size, color, and texture of what you're trying to show us. Thanks.

Luck & Regards,