No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Analysis of Zn-Ni plating & trivalent chrome




Q. We are doing alkaline non-cyanide zinc - nickel alloy electroplating to meet one of our specific customer requirements. At present we do analyse by Atomic Absorption Spectrometric this on eBay or Amazon [affil links] method. Due to some un avoidable circumstances, we could not continue our bath analysis (Zinc, Nickel in plating bath & Trivalent Chrome in passivation bath).

We also have ED-XRF and UV Visible spectrometer. We like to standardise this for our analysis purpose. Is it possible to analyse as mentioned above quantitatively? If so, request to mention the international standards to carryout our analysis.

Thanks.

Narasimhun Parthasarathy
Process Development Engineer - Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
2007


A. AA is best for zinc nickel solution analysis. You should consider getting it going again. I do not personally like XRF for solution analysis, but you can analyze your %Ni in the plate if you can get good standards. Your spectrophotometer could work if you spend some time validating your method. You should buy Aubrey Knowles' book Colorimetric Analysis of Metal Finishing & Metal Working Solutions & Effluents[this on on Amazonaffil links], which will give you various methods to try out.

Jon Barrows
Jon Barrows, MSF, EHSSC
GOAD Company
supporting advertiser
Independence, Missouri
goadbanner4
2007


Q. JON:

Why you don't like the XRF method?
Could I know your reasons please?

Jose Castellanos
- Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
January 2, 2008



January 23, 2008

A. Jose-
It's just my opinion here. Every technology has ideal applications as well as applications that are possible, but not ideal. For Zinc/Nickel plating, XRF is ideally suited for determining the %Ni and %Zn in the final plate as well as the plating thickness. XRF can be outfitted to analyse solutions accurately, but it's just not what they are good at. There are too many other options, like AA, that will give a more reliable result for the wet chemistry. If you have an XRF already with all of the necessary upgrades for solution analysis, then by all means use it. Just run standards to make sure that you are getting a good and repeatable result. Be prepared to be disappointed with the accuracy and precision. My opinion is that you need both the XRF and the AA for a reliable Zn-Ni process.

Jon Barrows
Jon Barrows, MSF, EHSSC
GOAD Company
supporting advertiser
Independence, Missouri
goadbanner4



thumbs up sign JON,

Thank you so much with your response. I agree totally with you. AAS this on eBay or Amazon [affil links] is the best technique. It only need an expert.

Jose Castellanos [returning]
- Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
February 27, 2008




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"