No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

Creating a spec for RoHS compliant finishes




2007

Hello,

I hope this isn't too abstract of a request, but I am in need of considerable guidance.

I have been given the assignment of creating/finishing a spec, to be referenced on our drawings, regarding RoHS compliant surface coatings. I have never written a spec, let alone for something I know nothing about.

I am looking for a format to follow. Is there generic verbiage that I should use? What information should be given, besides thicknesses, so that I am not too vague or overly wordy. I will find out what specific coating materials are to be used, as of this writing, I only know the powder coating material.

Our product is x-ray equipment in an office environment, so corrosion isn't an issue. The bulk of our components are presently anodized aluminum and painted/plated steel. We are also currently investigating powder coatings.

Thank you in advance for any assistance.

Best regards,

Richard Spencer
Mechanical Designer - Hatfield, Pennsylvania, USA



First of two simultaneous responses --

If I were you, I'd focus on where ROHS non-compliant materials might creep in.

Though it is not common, steels occasionally contain lead to improve machinability. This would likely make them non-compliant.

The other possibility I see is a hexavalent chromium conversion coating used in conjunction with zinc plating applied for paint prep. or as a stand alone finish on internal parts. That would also make them non-compliant.

dave wichern
Dave Wichern
Consultant - The Bronx, New York
2007



Second of two simultaneous responses -- 2007

Hi Richard,

The specification is there to inform the manufacturer that you are aware of current legislation and that you wish him to conform to its requirements.

I think what legislation is trying to achieve is that when your item becomes surplus to requirements and sent away for recycling it will not create problems to the environment due to unacceptable high heavy metal content.

Here are the parameters according to European legislation:

To comply with EU directive 2002/95/EC requires that the homogeneous material does not contain more than:

0.1% of Pb, Hg, Cr(Vi), PBB (polybrominated biphenyls), PBDE (polybrominated diphenyl ethers) per substance and per homogeneous material and less than:

0.01% Cd per homogeneous material.

Terry Hickling
Birmingham, United Kingdom



2007
"It means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less"
-- Humpty Dumpty in Lewis Carroll's "Through the Looking Glass"

Thanks, Terry. But readers should be warned never to use that word "homogeneous" in their own specs, but rather to always refer back to what the EU Directive chooses that word to mean, because the EU Directive plays Humpty Dumpty to their Alice, and their meaning of "homogeneous" is not logically deducible.

The EU chooses "homogeneous" to mean complete nonsense like --

So don't use the word "homogeneous" in your spec, Richard; put the EU interpretation of what it means in your spec.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey


Theoretically, specifications may contain whatever the writer wants to, but in order to be respectful and respected they must be deeply informed, informative, well structured, congruent and in accordance with higher level regulations and specifications. They should be prepared and revised by experienced people. It seems quite a disproportionate task for a person that declares to know nothing about it. Why don't you tell your boss to assign someone else with more experience. That would be very honest. If doing so might risk your job, you have a long way in front. Get as many books and specs as you can about the subject and study them. Also ask for very close help.

Guillermo Marrufo
Monterrey, NL, Mexico
2007



Although your conclusion is a bit harsh, I thought your description of the properties and requirements of a specification was terrific, Guillermo. Thanks.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
2007




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"