data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609bf/609bf7ec06bf67551c64cf7db86c75e1b2429ebb" alt="ted_yosem"
Curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e2f/26e2f7d702dd7be41aa0820ea5caf290b7b90d67" alt="finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry"
The authoritative public forum
for Metal Finishing 1989-2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f77c/5f77ca5bdcdc1dd640bc1c826f3906846739a5b0" alt="mfhotline"
-----
Dacrotized vs HDG for the environment
I have heard that a "Dacrotized" finish is more "environmentally friendly" than a hot dip galvanized finish because of the water based materials used to produce the finish. Is there any evidence to support this claim?
Jim ScissomSheet metal fabricator - Ladson, South Carolina
2007
Cradle-to-grave impact is very resistant to computation. A reputable research organization recently made themselves a laughingstock by trying cradle-to-grave energy computations for autos and finding that a Hummer consumed less energy than a Prius.
When it comes to environmental impact, the exceptionally difficult becomes ludicrous because environmental impact can't be measured in BTUs or otherwise quantified -- it's totally subjective. How does one weigh a brook trout against a field of Monarch butterflies against a smogless sky? It's fine to try to avoid a specific environmental threat if you think a particular finish (like cadmium) is a problem -- but if there is no specific environmental threat to avoid, I say use the finish that best suits your parts. Good luck.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66977/66977f48080787b62782341b37ef28f9a7b76909" alt="Ted Mooney, finishing.com"
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
2007
Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread