No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

RoHS-compatible Electroless nickel on copper alloys




I have a client job shop that is having a problem with lead and cadmium free electroless nickel on copper alloys such as brass. Plating starts then stops after a short period of time. this problem does not occur with more conventional electroless nickel solutions.

Bert J. Sherwood
Consultant - Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
2007



I'm surprised that the plating even starts in the first place, Bert. Copper and brass are not catalytic to electroless nickel as far as I know. You need to apply electricity to start it; maybe they just need to hold the electricity on for a few seconds as they immerse the parts, rather than a quick spark?

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
2007



2007

I agree with Ted, you need an electrolytic layer between the copper and the EN,no matter whether it complies with RoHS or not.
I prefer a nickel strike layer.

sara michaeli
sara michaeli signature
Sara Michaeli
Tel-Aviv-Yafo, Israel



Thanks, Ted and others for responding. We do start the plating with an aluminum alloy rod (2024 or 6061) to get the electrical activation. As the EN plating builds up on the brass, it becomes irregular in patches,and loses brightness. We do not have this problem with conventional, non-RoHS proprietary baths.

Have also tried electrolytic nickel strike with same results. We are going to try a dash of science using a measured voltage and time.

Will let you know.

Bert Sherwood

P.S. Nice hearing from you Ted. We are out here in LA in a state of dormancy.

Bert J. Sherwood
- Los Angeles, California, USA
2007



Sorry I didn't see you at Sur/Fin, Bert. The RoHS baths are definitely different than conventional baths because they do not have lead and cadmium as regulators and "poisons"; but I'm afraid that I don't know how to fix them if the process worked fine with non-RoHs baths.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
2007


none
finishing.com is made possible by ...
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages



(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"