No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Is Passivation or Black Oxide Finish better for Stainless Steel?

adv.
epi


Q. Can some tell me where I can get information about black oxide/passivation process. I mean website. I design opto-mechanical components for Nortel Networks. The material of the components are either steel or stainless steel. These components need to be coated black. At this point, I have very little knowledge of the process. I want to know the basic fundamental of this process so I can talk to the vendors.

Thanks,

Lee A.
Nortel Networks - Billerica, Massachusetts
2001


A. Lee -

Black oxide is a common choice for optical components because it doesn't change any part dimensions and will stay black even in some pretty extreme conditions.

Dan Brewer
chemical process supplier - Gurnee, Illinois




Q. I am trying to evaluate two supplied metal threaded studs. Both are manufactured using 'CRES' (Corrosion Resistant Steel?). The stated finish on one is 'passivated' the other is 'black oxide'

My questions are:

What are relative advantages or disadvantages of using one finish over the other?

Is there a non-destructive test to confirm passivation has been performed? (Is visual sufficient?)

Richard Shamblin
Consumer - Knoxville, Tennessee
2007


simultaneous replies

A. The passivated one will be more corrosion resistant, unless the black oxide is oiled or waxed.
Salt spray testing would be a cheap and reasonable test for rusting resistance.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida


A. No definite answer. Depends upon the particular CRES alloy, supplemental treatment given the black oxide, usage and corrosive environment.

A black oxided surface is used with liquid or dry film lubricants (which may incorporate anti-corrosives) which should be chosen for the particular usage. Black oxide is probably better for wear or galling resistance. Passivation may give better corrosion resistance in exposed locations which would wash away the black oxide's supplemental treatment.

Visual inspection cannot confirm passivation (although absence might be detected by rusting in humid environs). A quick and easy method not requiring test equipment is the copper sulphate this on eBay or Amazon [affil links] test (method 102 of MIL-STD-753 [on DLA / cancelled]. Limitations: 304 & 316 may pass this test even without passivation (provided they've been properly handled), whereas some 400 series & PH SS may fail even if passivated. Very good indicator of non-passivation when 304 or 316 fail, though.

Ken Vlach [deceased]
- Goleta, California
contributor of the year Finishing.com honored Ken for his countless carefully researched responses. He passed away May 14, 2015.
Rest in peace, Ken. Thank you for your hard work which the finishing world, and we at finishing.com, continue to benefit from.





Q. If one of these two processes were to be used in an interior of a vehicle on a very small piece of SS (430L or 434L) what would the best process be? This small piece is made to blend with other black items in the interior of a vehicle.

Thank you

Katherine Seefeldt
- Janesville, Wisconsin USA
October 24, 2016


A. The main thing I try to point out in these situations is, if you want a coating anyway (black oxide, paint, powder coat, etc.), why use stainless steel in the first place? You may as well save on material costs and use mild steel.

The main point of stainless steel is the surface is more corrosion resistant as the bare metal (usually with passivation, of course).

If you must, then stainless can be painted or powder coated without too much trouble, but processes like black oxide and electroplating typically require stainless to be activated using a very harsh acid mix.

ray kremer
Ray Kremer
Stellar Solutions, Inc.
supporting advertiser
McHenry, Illinois
stellar solutions banner


none
www.finishing.com is made possible by supporting advertisers ...
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages



(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"