data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609bf/609bf7ec06bf67551c64cf7db86c75e1b2429ebb" alt="ted_yosem"
Curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e2f/26e2f7d702dd7be41aa0820ea5caf290b7b90d67" alt="finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry"
The authoritative public forum
for Metal Finishing 1989-2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f77c/5f77ca5bdcdc1dd640bc1c826f3906846739a5b0" alt="mfhotline"
-----
Best tests for galvanizing coating weight?
We are installing a new galvanizing line and the question has come up on the methods used to check the coating weight. The only method we have been asked about is "weigh-strip-weigh". Is this best method or is there comparison information about the different methods?
Jim Humpolickproject manager - Ukranie
2007
First of two simultaneous responses --
The weigh - strip- weigh method is a destructive one. It only tests what the coating weight WAS, as after the test there's no coating.
Far more practical is the magnetic systems which use a small handheld device that non-destructively test for thickness over the steel. Readout in microns (or other units), with reasonable accuracy to about ± 3 microns.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c023/7c023831257ff4377e86b22c7fac9a331b93690d" alt="geoff_crowley"
Geoff Crowley
Crithwood Ltd.
Westfield, Scotland, UK
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1f80/d1f80c26982a46392cc46a46ef401f26aaed7577" alt="crithwood logo"
2007
Second of two simultaneous responses -- 2007
Sir:
A "banana" permanent magnetic thickness gauge made in the USA or Germany gave best precision and accuracy in the 300,000+ test readings that I published in the split article in the journal Metal Finishing. The electronic, more expensive gauges gave lower precision.
Regards,
Galvanizing Consultant - Hot Springs, South Dakota, USA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2afea/2afea51fe7ef0c02680e763ff5812246338f91a2" alt="none"
Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread