data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609bf/609bf7ec06bf67551c64cf7db86c75e1b2429ebb" alt="ted_yosem"
Curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e2f/26e2f7d702dd7be41aa0820ea5caf290b7b90d67" alt="finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry"
The authoritative public forum
for Metal Finishing 1989-2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f77c/5f77ca5bdcdc1dd640bc1c826f3906846739a5b0" alt="mfhotline"
-----
Seeking non-carcinogenic MIL-C-5541
My problem is to substitute Alodine 1200 with a non-carcinogenic product, retaining the same performances(MIL-C-5541). Is it possible?
P. cirese-bisenzio - italia
2000
![]() |
No. Similar, remotely possible the last I knew, but not the same. James Watts- Navarre, Florida P. Cirese : Not yet...a process to replace and equal systems like Alodine 1200 are trying to be achieved. Bill Hemptech svc. w/ chemical supplier - Grand Rapids, Michigan MIL-C-5541 requires materials "accordance with the qualification requirements of MIL-C-81706 and been accepted for listing on the applicable Qualified Products List". MIL-C-81706 states "The material shall be formulated from chromates ... shall be capable of forming non-electrically a chromate conversion coating." It would be impossible to meet this requirement without carcinogenic chromium. There are non-chromium products being marketed as equivalent to MIL-C-5541, but they do not meet the specification requirements as currently written. Chris Jurey, Past-President IHAALuke Engineering & Mfg. Co. Inc. ![]() Wadsworth, Ohio ![]() |
Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread