No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

Shot peening titanium; cross contamination of steel




Q. DO WE HAVE TO ETCH TITANIUM TO REMOVE .0002 TO .0004 INCH MATERIAL FROM EACH SURFACE TO REMOVE CONTAMINATION AND EMBEDDED METAL BEFORE SHOT PEENING OR CAN WE SHOT PEEN FINISH MACHINED PART AFTER DEGREASING?

HASHIR A KHAN
AEROSPACE - SANTA ANA, California
2006


A. It all depends on design/drawing requirements. You would normally remove material prior to flaw detection rather than shot peening as this removes smeared material after machining to ensure any flaws are revealed.
I would suspect that general cleaning (degreasing, aqueous washing or similar) would be sufficient prior to shot peening (but don't quote me on that). If in doubt check with your customer who will willingly tell you what they require.

Brian Terry
Aerospace - Yeovil, Somerset, UK


A. You can dip in 50% nitric acid before ,or after if you used steel media for shot peening. Good luck

Cair Shishani
Khair Shishani
aircraft maintenance - Al Ain, UAE




Shot Peening Books
shot_peening
on eBay or

AbeBooks or

Amazon

(affil links)

Q. To all,
we are going to use a shot peening machine to process both titanium and steel parts. The used shots are S230, i.e. steel themselves. For the titanium parts we foresee a chemical decontamination after peening from steel. What about steel parts? Do they need to be decontaminated by the titanium particles inevitably present into the shot flow? If yes How can we decontaminate?

MAURICE GIGOTTI
manufacturing engineer - Italy
September 29, 2009


A. There is always the possibility of cross contamination no matter what steps are taken. If you have enough volume, it is highly suggested to get 2 different machines dedicated specifically to each separate process. This is normal in the aircraft industry.

tony kenton
AF Kenton
retired business owner - Hatboro, Pennsylvania


A. From a corrosion standpoint at least, I wouldn't worry too much about titanium particles embedded in steel. However steel particles embedded in titanium is a big problem. Prevention, i.e. using dedicated non-ferrous shot media for anything that isn't carbon steel, tends to be a much better option than decontaminating the parts after you have blasted steel into the surface.

ray kremer
Ray Kremer
Stellar Solutions, Inc.
supporting advertiser
McHenry, Illinois
stellar solutions banner


Q. The maximum volume rate will be: 24 titanium items and 8 300M items per month. It doesn't seem to be very high.
Nevertheless we are worried only about the contamination of titanium on steel. So there is no way to perform this decontamination? However Is there any possibility to reduce this risk?

MAURICE GIGOTTI [returning]
manufacturing engineer - Italy




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"