Determine % Nitric Acid. Titration? Conversion factor?

A. Jim, 8 is way too high a pH as metal hydroxides will form and not go back into solution in any reasonable time frame. Typically, pH's of 4 to 5 are used and have virtually no effect on the titration because pH is logarithmic.

A. If you want to check that which kind of acid is there you have given , then you please first confirm it acid by titration with caustic and find out the acidity. Then add barium chloride, silver nitrate, and lead acetate, in three different test tubes, and add that unknown and neutralized acid one by one. Check for any precipitation. If it gives white precipitates with barium chloride then that acid may be sulfuric acid, if it gives white precipitates with silver nitrate then that acid may be hydrochloric acid.

A. Kim,
Simple if you have fluid oz per gal. Convert gals to fluid oz. Divide fl oz of acid by fluid oz of a gal and multiply by 100 to get %.

A. First things first, I'm not a chemist, but here's what I'd do: I would make a small amount of a known solution concentration (your ideal concentration), and titrate per your established procedure. When the known solution reaches the colormetric endpoint, corresponding with the known concentration of the solution, measure the pH. Use that pH reading going forward as your endpoint during your titration, as opposed to the color change. This takes the variability of color perception out of the equation. Marc Green anodizer - Boise, Idaho A. I concur with Mr. Watts. pH 8 is too high. At that pH you're going to see a lot of NaOH uptake from the hydrolysis of transition metal ions. Methyl orange ⇦ this on eBay or Amazon [affil links] is probably a better choice than phenolphthalein. Dave Wichern Consultant - The Bronx, New York A. Phenolphthalein is probably the worst indicator that you could use if you have any dissolved metal in it. You need an indicator that changes color in the 4-5 pH range. Methyl red ⇦ this on eBay & Amazon [affil links] and methyl orange ⇦ this on eBay or Amazon [affil links] are frequently used. Some like one better than the other. Second, you need to add the hydroxide very slowly as it will drop out the metals as hydroxides and they do not go back into solution very easily. I adopted using a smaller sample (with calibrated pipet) and titrating with 0.1N hydroxide with spin bar agitation. To get everyone on the same page, why not use a good quality pH meter to establish a color change point that everyone will accept. James Watts - Navarre, Florida

A. Hi Barb,
Try bromocresol green ⇦ this on eBay & Amazon [affil links] ; that gives a more defined end point than phenolphthalein, so there should be less room for discussion as to where the end point is.
Best Regards
Mark

A. Bromocresol green ⇦ this on eBay & Amazon [affil links] is a good indicator. Look it up and see what the color change points are. My foggy memory says that it had 2. If so, use the lower one. James Watts - Navarre, Florida A. The way I remember learning it, when you start to see the indicator changing color as the drop falls in and then immediately vanishing as it mixes, it's time to slow the drops way the heck down. Then, when the color changes all the way without reversing due to the mixing, that's the titration end point. Of course, just using a pH meter works too as long as you're confident of the calibration. If dissolved metals are interfering as James Watts suggests, you may need to precipitate them out beforehand with something that will not disturb the acid content. Ray Kremer Stellar Solutions, Inc. McHenry, Illinois A. Good day Barb. I use phenolphthalein ⇦ this on eBay & Amazon [affil links] for my sulfuric anodize analysis, and it is tricky, as you must determine when there is no longer ANY colour change. I make up a known concentration of acid in a 100 ml volumetric flask and verify, it works for me. For the nitric, try 1 ml in a 250 ml beaker [beakers on eBay or Amazon [affil links] , add 75 mls DI water, titrate with 1.0 N sodium hydroxide to pH 3.57, giving titre A. A stir bar on the magnetic hot plate ⇦ this on eBay or Amazon [affil links] gives good results, so titrate slowly. I found in my passivation solutions which do not contain iron or dichromate, pH values rise very slowly approaching 3.0, and then there is a quick spike. You can use 0.1 N Na OH here, with the math. Nitric acid in % BV = 6.45 X A Nitric acid in g/l = 63 x A Hope this helps. Regards, Eric Bogner, Lab. Tech Aerotek Mfg. Ltd. - Whitby, Ontario, Canada

A. I agree that bromocresol green ⇦ this on eBay & Amazon [affil links] is the most user-friendly indicator for Nitric baths.
Personally I'm less of a fan of the methyl orange color shift, as it goes through quite a color range on its way to salmon red.
phenolphthalein definitely has its place in Sulfuric bath titration (and others). But as was alluded to earlier, by the time you hit the PTH endpoint, you're in the precipitation range for many metal hydroxides, and can easily get a false high reading if you're not prepared for them. In an anodize bath you take the hydroxides out BEFORE starting the titration (KF50% at a ratio of about 2 parts potassium fluoride ⇦ this on Amazon [affil links] to 1 part bath aliquot); the difference between a treated and untreated sample is your aluminum value but that's another thread :)
You might notice that the pH endpoints are all vastly different, with MO around 4, BCG around 5, and PTH over 8... But once the acid is used up, the pH rises so rapidly that a minimal amount of titrant will cause it to skyrocket.
I agree also that it is an excellent habit to validate your titrations by creating a known standard and testing it. I did that with EVERY TANK when I took over my current lab. It's also a good instructional tool for new techs.

A. Hi Kate,
The indicator you should use is bromocresol green ⇦ this on eBay & Amazon [affil links] .
Also your multiplication factor looks like the one for sulfuric acid.
You should multiply your titre by 0.65. This works for a 10ml vat sample titrated with 1.0N sodium Hydroxide [1N NaOH on Amazon [affil links] , and give you a result expressed as percent by volume of 70% (700g/l) nitric acid. S.G. 1.41.
For 60% nitric acid use 0.76 as the factor.
I hope this helps, and good luck
Mark

A. Hi again Kurt!
I read your post with a bit of a smile... You're going to drive yourself nuts over your DeOx! :)
Please don't! No doubt you've allowed yourself a pair of working ranges (target +/- some amount recommended by the manufacturer or your own experience, and then a narrower range like a warning limit) and your most simple, basic, goal for accuracy of the titration is to make sure that your titration error won't ever be enough to make you THINK you're in shop range when you're not, and that your adds will be accurate.

Your titrator sounds pretty repeatable especially considering the small aliquot being tested; I'm impressed. Usually smaller samples mean more analytical error, and 0.5% is outstanding.

Don't sweat the 'noise' TOO much in your samples over time. It happens. Reduction, rather than elimination, of the noise is about the best you can ask for. There's a lot going on, chemically, in a DeOx tank, and every new load of parts dropping off a new load of smut is going to slightly (even imperceptibly) shift how a free acid titration presents at that moment- It's larger trends over time that matter, and I totally get how you'd like to see your Nitric results looking more like your first graph. It's a chemical crockpot in there and you are correct that a reduction in noise may be achieved by ideal sampling.

To answer your question about sampling- you mentioned you swirl the tank with a paddle? Do you really not have a mixer in that tank (sparge, rotary, or recirculating)? If the tank is mixed well enough to function correctly, a dipper right from a few inches below the surface is absolutely fine. Rinse the dipper in the DeOx and dump it out a couple times before taking the sample.

The takeaway is don't get too crazy chasing perfection in a DeOx tank of all places, and you really want to make sure your tank is well mixed both at time of drawing test samples and time of use for best results with both!

A. Hi Jevetta. It's hard to offer good answers to a question until it is well understood. This pickling solution is straight nitric acid (no fluorides, sulphates, or other acids), and you would like a procedure for testing the wt percent of nitric acid ... but due to use it may be contaminated with those 5 metals? Or are you saying you want to know the procedures for measuring the nitric acid plus for each of those 5 metals? Is there a need for clarification or do you have questions or on any of the many comments already offered? Thanks!

Regards,

A. Hi Jevetta,
For accurate quantification of metals, especially at low or low-ish levels, running by plasma spectrophotometry is standard. Test kits can give a crude result at higher levels but aren't particularly accurate, and are prone to matrix interference- you'd have to buy one specifically for a Nitric matrix. The good news is that Nitric acid is actually the required preservative for metals samples in aqueous solutions, and won't interfere at all with plasma spectrophotometry. You would do well to call around to a water testing or other analytical lab and find out what they charge- be sure to tell them what your matrix is- I can guarantee that it is MUCH cheaper than trying to buy all the chemicals, equipment, and training literature you'd need (not to mention labor costs!) to quantify various metals in solution. I've worked as a chemical analyst for well over a decade so far and, not to discourage anyone from learning how to do tests, it's time consuming and expensive.

Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
AWWA

on AbeBooks

or eBay or

Amazon

(affil links)

If you really want to know, grab a copy of "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater", being sure it's an edition that was written AT LEAST as recently as the 1990s ⇨

A. Hi Stephanie,
If you use 0.5N on a titration that is calculated for 1.0, then logically you must then recalculate.

For example, if your titration used up 10.6 mL of 0.5N NaOH, it would have only used up 5.3 mL of 1.0N NaOH (because 1.0N is twice as strong as 0.5N) to reach the same endpoint.

Using a larger volume of a less concentrated titrant will increase resolution (though frankly plating-shop-floor titration is not a particularly precise branch of analytical chemistry lol) but you must remember to mathematically correct for any variation in titrant strength in your equations.

A. Hi Josh L.

This is a nice question and there's an answer to it.
I also hope others will check the calculations and prove me wrong (or not)

You actually ask for an analytical chemistry course. I can recommend you A.Vogel's book about analytical chemistry ⇨

I didn't see how much solution you pipette, but that's not too important for the first part of the answer:

The titration you do is an acid-base titration, whereby the reaction is:
HNO3 + NaOH -> NaNO3 + H2O.

The theory in this titration is relatively simple. It is what we call an acid-base titration, whereby you neutralize the acid with the NaOH till the point that your indicator changes color, which is also the moment that all the acid is neutralized by the caustic (NaOH).

In this case you're lucky as the reaction equation goes like: 1 mole of HNO3 reacts with 1 mole NaOH to give 1 mole NaNO3 and 1 mole H2O.

(The mole is used in chemistry and is the unit of measurement for amount of substance in the International System of Units (SI). A mole of a substance or a mole of particles is defined as exactly 6.02214076x10^23 particles, which may be atoms, molecules, ions, or electrons)

Using the periodic chart you can find all the atomic weights of a mole of your elements and so find the grams of HNO3 that react with the grams of NaOH and you can even find how many grams of reaction products you get.....
Let's Look it up:
H = 1,008 gram per Mole
N = 14,01 " " "
O = 16.00 " " "
Na = 22,99" " "
So that means:
HNO3 + NaOH -> NaNO3 + H2O.
63.018g HNO3 + 39.998g NaOH --> 85g NaNO3 + 18.016g H2O


I must hope that the NaOH [1N NaOH on Amazon [affil links] you buy is from a certified supplier. That means that the amount of NaOH in the 1N solution is precisely weighted and dissolved to be exactly 1N. That way the whole titration is NIST traceable.
A 1N NaOH solution contains exactly 39.998 g/l. NaOH if you buy a certified solution and as long as you keep the bottle tightly closed, that is true.
However, you should keep in mind that, if you open up the bottle and use it for a long time, some of that NaOH will change to carbonate and your solution will not be exactly 1N anymore. Therefor, if you do this titration not very often, you can check your 1N NaOH, by buying also another burette and fill it with a solution of 1N HCl ⇦ this on Amazon [affil links] .
If you now titrate a known volume of NaOH and use the same indicator and see if you need to titrate exactly the same amount of 1N HCl in ml to neutralize that NaOH solution (Indicator color change)you can check that NaOH standard in practice also.
If you find +/- 1% difference, I wouldn't be too concerned at all.

The next step is how you get to that 6.45 number and what it means.


I always prefer to express numbers in g/l or oz/gallons, as % HNO3 differs.

Let's assume that to increase your concentration, you add a solution of 50% HNO3 with a density of 1,310 g/l. (A well known industry standard)
As it is 50 mass %, it contains 655g/l. HNO3.

If I take a sample with a pipette of exactly 5 milliliter of this HNO3 solution, I have (655/1000)*5 = 3.275grams of HNO3 in that sample.

We have seen earlier that 1N NaOH contains 39.998g/liter
NaOH and that we can neutralize 63.018g HNO3 with that.

(HNO3 + NaOH -> NaNO3 + H2O.
63.018g HNO3 + 39.998g NaOH --> 85g NaNO3 + 18.016g H2O)

So this 5 ml sample that contains 3.275g HNO3 will need

(3.275/63.018)*39.998 = 2.0777g NaOH to be neutralized, or
(2.0777/39.998)*1000 = 51.95ml of a 1N NaOH solution.

As I don't know how much you pipette as a sample, I can't finish this for you, but I hope I gave you enough insight to do this yourself. If not, no problem, just ask.

Keep in mind that using "volume of HNO3" assumes that the HNO3 is always the same concentration, and I can guarantee you, it's not. Therefore, if your composition is critical, you better use the g/l. or oz/gallon calculation. If it is not, it doesn't matter too much, you probably have wide limits.

So to go back to your auditor's question: Due to the fact that you buy certified 1N NaOH standard solutions (not worth making them yourself, but you could if you had a good analytical balance and pure NaOH) and check them regularly with the 1N HCl solution, the outcome of this analysis is always guaranteed to be OK (as long as you have skilled people that do the titrations and you don't take shortcuts.) The latter you can test with an MSA.

Hope I didn't lose you. Sorry for my European units ...

Take Care,

Harry.

A. Hi Josh,

Thanks for your kind words, that motivates to continue....

Recap:
The reaction in that titration is:
1 Mole HNO3 + 1 Mole NaOH -> 1 Mole NaNO3 + 1Mole H2O.
Or (the moles converted into grams, using the periodic table atomic mass data)
63.018g HNO3 + 39.998g NaOH --> 85g NaNO3 + 18.016g H2O

So a certified 1N NaOH [1N NaOH on Amazon [affil links] solution contains 39.998g NaOH
Your 70% (68 - 70), let's use 69% w/w HNO3 solution has a density of 1.42, which would mean 0.69*1420g/l. = 979.8g/l. HNO3

If you pipette 1ml and you need to find 6.45ml of 1N NaOH at the titration, than that 6.45ml of 1N NaOH neutralizes:
(6.45/1000)*63.018g HNO3 = 0.4065 gram of HNO3
Or that equals (as it is 1/1000th of a liter), a concentration of 406.5gram per liter HNO3 in your electrolyte.

Converting it into a volume % of 69% HNO3 would mean that the nominal composition = (406.5g/979.8g/l) = 41.5 volume % of a 69% HNO3 solution

If your target is 25 - 45%, you're good here.

But if your target is 45 - 55%, you're on the low side of the concentration.
In that case you would shoot for 50% by volume of a 69% (68-70) by weight nitric acid solution. (Density 1.42kg/l.)

As seen before, that 69% solution contains 69% of 1.42 = 979.8g/l. HNO3 and 50% by volume would contain 489.9g/l.
a 1 ml sample would contain 0.4899gram HNO3 if your solution were at exactly that 50%

Back to the general reaction:
63.018g HNO3 + 39.998g NaOH --> 85g NaNO3 + 18.016g H2O
That means that:
0.4899g HNO3 is neutralized by (0.4899/63.018)*39.998 = 0.31094g NaOH and as ml of 1N NaOH contains .039998g NaOH, you would need 7.77ml to be at the exact 50%.


In a similar way you can calculate your milliliters needed for a 20 - 25% v/v of the 70% solution.

One general advice, for those lower concentrated solutions (and actually also for the 50% one): you better pipette 3 ml of the solution. You don't want to be in a very low range with your burette, as your absolute fault in the reading remains the same over the whole burette range, but get's relatively pretty big if you titrate so little. Of course you need to change the factors too in that case.

Not being a passivation expert and it might be that people contradict me, but in general, the process window for passivating in HNO3 is pretty wide. +/- 20% concentration variation won't hurt, but you might not be able to start that discussion with an auditor without having your own evidence for that……

Good luck, hope this finally helps you out. Don't forget you've been doing this for 15 years an probably never had any complaint or problem, but alas, specification is specification and the AMS2700 is what you have to live up to I guess.

Take Care,

Harry

"The Canning Handbook of Surface Finishing Technology"

on AbeBooks

or eBay or

Amazon

(affil links)

A. Hi Casey,
The factor comes from a method in 'The Canning Handbook', page 935.
It is a well known old publication on electroplating.
It is no longer in print, but old copies can be found via eBay, etc. from time to time.
The factor is adjusted for a 10ml solution sample.
The 0.65 factor is used if you are topping up your tank with 70% wt/wt nitric acid, S.g. 1.41.
If you are topping up with 60% wt/wt nitric acid, S.G. 1.37, then the factor becomes 0.76.
I hope this helps.
best regards
Mark

A. Thanks Mark. The Canning Handbook is now apparently available as a paperback through Amazon (not vouching for the paperback publisher) or a Kindle e-book. They claim to be the 23rd edition, which was published in 1982 (my hardcover is 23rd edition).

Readers: I read some reviews that said this is not a great plating book for a number of reasons including being outdated and relying heavily on proprietary names. My comment is that, indeed, it's not a good "first & only" book for those reasons and more ... but if you have a couple of others it's a really great one, offering practical approaches to so many issues :-)

A. Good Afternoon Zander

We found the Hanna Instruments HI 902 semi-automated titration system (Now replaced by the HI932) to suit our needs. This system provided the accuracy, consistency between technicians(in comparison to a manual titrator results between technicians)and time to get results. All of the results are the saved and the results are transferred to a spreadsheet where we track/graph the titration results . We run this testing 3 times a week for the 5 separate titrations required for Chem Film process.
1.) Cleaner/Degreaser concentration in % by volume to water
2.) Deox grams/liter of nitric acid = (ml titration value)
3.) Deox grams/liter of Deox Concentrate = (ml titration value)
4.) Hexavalent Chrome Solution mg/ml
5.) pH of Hexavalent Chrome

All our Chem film titrations are completed in an average of one hour.

Hope this helps.

Cheers