No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

Nickel Plating and RoHS requirement




Q. We have come to a disagreement with a supplier on the interpretation of RoHS. We are currently looking at the data sheets on a part that is made of brass and is also nickel plated. The test report indicates the nickel plating contains 3.4% of lead.

We see it as the part is not RoHS compliant because the plating contains more than 0.1% lead. The supplier said the part is RoHS compliant because it can have up to 4% lead because the material is brass. Who is correct? Thank you.

Scott Yu
- Nevada City, California, USA
2006



A. Your supplier is spot on. Under Annex of Directive 2002/95/EC " Applications of lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, which are exempted from the requirements of Article 4(1), item 6 reads...."Lead as an alloying element in steel containing up to 0.35% lead by weight, aluminium containing up to 0.4% lead by weight, and as copper alloy containing up to 4% lead by weight".

SK Cheah
- Penang Malaysia
2006


thumbs up sign Dear Ted.
I stand corrected in my earlier post (2006). It has indeed become clear to me. The substrate and plating are two entities and has to have its own merit to meet ROHS. In this case, the alloy being brass (4% tolerable limit for lead) and for nickel plating (0.1% tolerable limit for lead). Thank you all for pointing me in the right direction.

SK Cheah
- Penang Malaysia
December 26, 2012


Q. Here's the confusion that we have. Their test report indicates the plating contains 3.4% lead. I know brass can be up to 4% lead. The confusion is, does the 4% apply to the complete part including the base material AND the plating? Or is the 4% only applies to the material and the 0.1% for the plating?

Does RoHS compliant material + non-RoHS compliant plating = RoHS compliant part?

Scott Yu [returning]
- Nevada City, California, USA
2006



A. The question is if the part is considered homogeneous with the plating or not if I understand you correctly.

I would say NO. Whether or not the alloy can contain % of lead has nothing to do with the coating applied. The coating must be compliant on its own merit to meet RoHS standards.

Bill Grayson
metal finishing - San Jose, California
2006



sidebar

thumbs up sign I agree with you, Bill. As an aside, the galvanizer's association doesn't, as mentioned in letter 40864. I think the galvanizers association will learn that they were wrong.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
2006


A. It seems to me that if the plating were considered homogenous with the base part no one would be worried about Hexavalent chrome passivation on a steel zinc plated machine screw, or the amount of Cadmium in an electroless Nickel plated standoff.

Douglas E. Raubacher
Electronics Fastener Distributer - Woodinville, Washington, USA
2006


A. The component is not RoHS compliant as the plating is not homogeneous, i.e., can be mechanically disjointed.

Ralph Knightley
- U.K.
August 23, 2012



"Quotable Alice"

on Amazon

(affil links)
August 23, 2012

thumbs up sign Thanks Ralph!

All: When Humpty Dumpty spouts nonsense in a debate, and Alice tries to explain that words must have consistent meanings, he tells Alice: "When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less".

And so it is with the RoHS language...

Although any school child can easily separate the chromate from the zinc plating with the eraser end of an old pencil stub... and although a skilled machinist can't remove the zinc plating from an object with a diamond-turned superalloy chisel, RoHS rules consider the chromate "homogeneous" to the plating, and the plating "not homogeneous" to the part -- because that's what they want it to mean.

Yes, they've attached a ludicrous meaning to the word "homogeneous", turned it on its head like Humpty Dumpty -- but that's just the way it is. And Bill, Douglas, and Ralph are correct!

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey


A. Hi Ted,

Different people can have different ideas on what a word means that is why in the standard this is defined:
Definition:
'homogeneous material' means one material of uniform composition throughout or a material, consisting of a combination of materials, that cannot be disjointed or separated into different materials by mechanical actions such as unscrewing, cutting, crushing, grinding and abrasive processes.

Took me a long time to get my head around that one!

Ralph Knightley
- U.K.
August 24, 2012


thumbs up sign Thanks again, Ralph; you're absolutely right that the plating is not 'homogeneous' to the component by that definition. My issue is that, per that same definition, the chromate conversion coating is absolutely not homogeneous with the plating. But what can I do but accept that Humpty Dumpty is the boss of me? :-)

Luck & Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey


A. Exemption 6C applies to lead in copper alloys.
www.getenviropass.com/rohs-exemptions-6/

And some finishes may be under an EU RoHS exemption.

Aury Hathout
- Montreal, QC
November 6, 2021




Q. Devendra Kumar
December 21, 2012
Brass testing report is showing 2.92% lead. Is the % correct for RoHS in India?





December 25, 2012

A. Hi Devandra.
I take it, your question '% correct for RoHS' to mean 'is this % RoHS compliant'. At 2.92% lead, the brass is certainly RoHS compliant.
Since brass is an alloy of copper, under Annex of Directive 2002/95/EC " Applications of lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, which are exempted from the requirements of Article 4(1), item 6 reads...."Lead as an alloying element in steel containing up to 0.35% lead by weight, aluminium containing up to 0.4% lead by weight, and as copper alloy containing up to 4% lead by weight".

SK Cheah
- Penang Malaysia





Q. Hello,

Is a manufactured fitting made of Brass and nickel plated fully RoHS compliant?

Donie Quintal [returning]
- Santa Ana, California
January 2, 2013



A. Hi Donie. We appended your inquiry to a thread which at least partially answers it, and implies that you may need to get further data. Good luck.

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
January 1, 2013



A. Hi Donie.
As Ted suggested, need more info.
1. what type brass material?
2. what type of nickel plating?

Cheah

SK Cheah
- Penang Malaysia
January 4, 2013



Q. Thanks Ted/Cheah for your comments. So, I made an inquiry from the manufacturer what type of brass material they used. The response is: 360 free machining brass. Please advise.

Donie Quintal [returning]
- Santa Ana, California
January 11, 2013



A. Hi Donie.

C3600 free cutting brass has a lead content of 2.5~3.7%.
This is well below the 4% maximum limit set for RoHS under Annex of Directive 2002/95/EC. You are RoHS compliant if C3600 material is used in your product.
Good Luck.

Cheah

SK Cheah
- Penang Malaysia
January 15, 2013



A. I think that the issue is not fully understood here.
Or maybe I mix a few terms.
If we are dealing with bathroom fittings, there is a problem with the water quality because of the lead in the brass.
The inside of the fitting is NOT plated with nickel and the water that comes out of this fitting is leaching lead and we DRINK it.
So, the requirement in this case is not ROHS but NSF61.
Nowadays all bathroom fitting made of brass have to be leached in special fluoride-containing solutions to leach the lead out of the brass.
BUT in 2014 or so, new regulations are coming up and manufacturers will be forced not to use lead-bearing brass.

sara michaeli
sara michaeli signature
Sara Michaeli
Tel-Aviv-Yafo, Israel
February 21, 2013




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"