No passwords, No popups, No AI, No cost:
we earn from your affiliate purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry


  pub
  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989

-----

RoHS compliance of galvanized finishes




Is Galvanealed and Galvanized RoHS compliant?

David Dezse
- Lewis Center, Ohio
2006


My understanding is that the organics on the RoHS list are not an issue with inorganic finishes, leaving only the metals cadmium, mercury, and lead, and the hexavalent form of chromium. Although you might need to check for the amount of contamination with cadmium, mercury, or lead, the only RoHS metal that I think is there by design is chromium, which is used to brighten galvanizing and deter white rusting. I think you need to specify that the galvanizing be free of hexavalent chromium and RoHS complaint

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey


THE AMERICAN GALVANIZERS ASSOCIATION IS ON RECORD AS SAYING THAT HEX CHROME TREATED GALVANIZING IS RoHS COMPLIANT . I AM CONFUSED...IS IT OR ISN'T IT?

DAVID S WARE
- Chattanooga, Tennessee


? Can you give us a link where they say this for the record, David?

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey



... and a few days go by and . . .

David copied us on a private letter from the AGA, as well as an AGA white paper and a European General Galvanizers Association (EGGA) white paper. Yes, AGA is apparently claiming that chromate quenched galvanizing is RoHS compliant and it looks like the European General Galvanizers Association asserts pretty much the same opinion. With the deadline less than 2 months away, we would hope that some official European Parliament tribunal would be issuing a non-ambiguous statement on this specific issue, but the wheels of bureaucracy turn slowly on both sides of the Atlantic. It looks like billions of dollars may be wasted before they give an interpretation -- and then tell us it was impossible to read it any other way :-)

Meanwhile I don't know if anyone can afford to change if the major associations are telling your competitors that they don't need to invest the resources to change. It's a thorny one. -- Ted.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey


none
adv.
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages



(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"