No passwords, No popups, No cost, No AI:
we earn from 'affiliate link' purchases, making the site possible

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
ted_yosem
Sound technical content, curated with aloha by
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, NJ
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

  The authoritative public forum
  for Metal Finishing since 1989
  mfhotline


  -----

Hard Anodize problems with 6061





I am having difficulty hard anodizing .002" thick on 6061. It doesn't happen on all 6061 parts, only some. We are anodizing at 36 ASF, and normally get .002" thickness in about 40 minutes, with somewhere around 50 volts. When we have the problem, the voltage rises quicker than usual, without forming the expected coating thickness. We only get about .0018" thickness after about 45 minutes, with an ending voltage of 70 volts. Has anyone experienced this problem? Does anyone know the cause? Does anyone have a fix?

Kent Kessler
Plating Shop Production Manager - Seattle, Washington, USA
2005



First of two simultaneous responses --

Kent

Over the years, we have seen varieties of 6061 aluminum that have shown the same symptoms you mentioned. Typically, those parts that were 'difficult' to achieve the 2-mil thickness were manufactured from a thinner stock of material (< .5" thick), and were almost exclusively from plate stock- the only exceptions were bar stock lapped parts.

We also experienced variations in 5052 aluminum where our target thickness was 5-mil. One heat lot would take 3.5 hours and the next took 8 hours- yes, we charged accordingly.

My guess is the temper is the root cause.

Our solution was the parts took longer to run. Same amp-hours per run, but after max'ing out on voltage, we'd continue to run as the CD cropped off until we hit the amp-hours required.

Best of luck, and Happy Holidays!

Willie Alexander
- Colorado Springs, Colorado
2005



Second of two simultaneous responses --

It sounds like you are using titanium racking (a no-no for hardcoat) and you may have an oxide on your rack points. A little more info would be helpful.

Marc Green
Marc Green
anodizer - Boise, Idaho
2005



Thank you for your responses - we will take a look at running a a lower current density, running a longer time.
A little more information - we are using aluminum racks (mostly 6061, with some components of 6063). The parts we are having problems with are cylindrical (close to 3" in diameter).

Kent Kessler
- Seattle, Washington, USA
2005



Hi Kent,

1. Its better to mask the unwanted areas of the racks(other than contact points), if not masked. Else the rack may draw more current.

2. Strip the rack at the end of the every batch/cycle,racks, if not following this.

thanks,

Keshava Prasad M
- Chennai, India
2006




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"